Sindh High Court
Mohammad Aslam Rana & anothers (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 724/2018
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Mr. Justice Abdul Maalik Gaddi
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH,
CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.
C.P. No.D-85 of 2012 C.P. No.D-724 of 2018.
C.P. No.D-361, 518, 1526, 1562 of 2019.
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
Mr. Muhammad Arshad S. Pathan advocate for petitioner in C.P. No.D-361, 518 & 1562 of 2019.
Mrs. Razia Ali Zaman Khan advocate for petitioners in C.P. No.D-1526 of Mr. Zaheeruddin Sahito advocate holds brief for Mr. Irfan Ali Bughio advocate for respondents No.6 to 10.
Mr. Allah Bachayo Soomro Additional Advocate General.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have been appointed in H.D.A. being public servant by adopting all legal procedures in the year 2007. He further submits that summary has been floated by the Project Director H.D.P. for contract employees. He also submits that H.D.A. misusing the Notification dated 28.01.2019, which is for the contract employees. It is also stated by learned counsel for petitioners that after passing order dated 28.01.2019 petitioners have joined their respective posts in H.D.A. and according to him they are working over there but they are deprived of their monthly salaries.
Mr. Ameer Faisal advocate files power on behalf of Secretary H.D.A. and seeks some time as Mr. Muhammad Saulat Rizvi advocate for H.D.A. has been appointed as Additional Advocate General where Mr. Irfan Ahmed Bughio could not
reach this Court due to some un-avoidable circumstances and on his behalf Mr.
Zaheeuddin Sahito advocate requests for an adjournment. Mr. Muhammad Arshad S. Pathan advocate shows urgency in the matter on the ground that petitioners are deprived of their monthly salaries since January, 2019.
Mr. Ameer Faisal advocate has drawn attention of this Court towards counter- affidavit and order passed by different benches of this Court and submits that on the next date of hearing he shall proceed with the matters himself on merits. Under these circumstances, matters are adjourned to 10.09.2020 when respondent No.6 (D.G. H.D.A.) shall appear in person alongwith all relevant record to assist this Court.
It is made clear that in case on the next date of hearing nobody appears on behalf of either party these matters shall be heard and decided on the basis of material available on record.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Irfan Ali
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1495 · 19 Aug 2020 Nadeem Ahmed Khan &another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 924 · 19 Aug 2020 Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1046 · 19 Aug 2020 Syed Furqan Ali and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 2289 · 19 Aug 2020 Ghulam Muhammad Qasmi & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 4 · 19 Aug 2020 Mirza Mukarram Hayat Baig & Ors. (Petitioner) VS Prov. Of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)