MUHAMMAD KHALID (Applicant) VS The STATE (Respondent)

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH,

CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.

Cr. Bail Application No.S-58 of 2020

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

1.For orders on M.A No.572/20.

2.For orders on office objection.

3.For orders on M.A No.573/20.

4.For hearing of main case.

Mr. Muhammad Shafique Khan, Advocate for applicant.

Ms. Ramesha Oad, Asst. Prosecutor General.

1.Urgency disposed of

2to4. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he would be satisfied and shall not press this bail application if the learned trial Court may be directed to frame the charge and record the evidence of complainant within a period of thirty (30) working days and thereafter the applicant may be allowed to file afresh bail application before the trial Court.

Learned A.P.G, who is present in court in some cases, recorded her no objection to the above proposition.

In view of the above, this bail application is dismissed as not pressed. However, Presiding Officer of the trial Court is directed to frame the charge and record the evidence of complainant within a period of thirty (30) working days from receipt of this order and no unnecessary adjournment shall be granted to either side; where-after, the applicant would be at liberty to file afresh bail application before the trial Court on fresh grounds, if he so advised and on filing such bail application, the trial Court shall decide the same as per law.

JUDGE

*Fahad Memon*