Sindh High Court
Talal Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 7221/2019
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
- Length
- 1 page
Summary from the court's website
Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine. Police Department--Son quota--The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision--Dismissed in limine.
Full judgment
Official copyIN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
Before:- Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P No.D-7221 of 2019 Talal Ahmed V/S Province of Sindh & 04 others.
Date of hearing & decision: 19.02.2020 Nemo for the petitioner.
Mr. Hakim Ali Shaikh, Additional Advocate General Sindh a/w Mr. Raza Mian, DSP (Legal) on behalf of I.G Sindh.
ORDER
ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J: Petitioner is seeking declaration to the effect that he is eligible and fit candidate for appointment as Police Constable in Police Department, on the basis of son quota.
2.Since 13.11.2019 nobody has bothered to put appearance to argue the matter. Prima facie, the issue is related to appointment on the basis of son quota in police department, therefore, the same is decided in the light of the policy for recruitment of constables in Sindh Police-2016. In our view, only those candidates can be appointed against the post of police constable, who meet the requisite criteria as provided in the Recruitment Rules-2016. In this regard, our view is supported by Rules 12.6 and 12.15 of Police Rules, 1934. We are fortified by the judgment rendered in the case of Gul Hassan Jatoi (supra) and Mohammad Nadeem Arif & others vs. IGP Punjab, Lahore & others, 2011 SCMR 408, in which Hon’ble Supreme Court has held that the Standing Orders issued by Inspector General of Police have to be approved by the Provincial Government.
3.The aforesaid legal position of the case explicitly shows that there is concept of only deceased quota subject to all just exceptions and not that of son quota. Since petitioner has applied against son quota in the police department, he is not entitled to such relief under the aforesaid provision. It is well-settled law that the appointment of police constable can only be made through competitive process on merit as provided under the recruitment rules and not otherwise.
4.In view of what has been discussed above, the instant Constitutional Petition is dismissed in limine along with pending application(s) with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Nadir*
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC KHI 638 · 10 Feb 2020 Zaheer Ahmed (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC KHI 82 · 6 Apr 2021 Mir Hassan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 3 Sep 2019 Imtiaz Hussain (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 19 Mar 2019 Rasheed Ahmed (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 31 Oct 2019 Muhammad Idrees Adil and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)