Sindh High Court
Mst. Zarina Anwar (Petitioner) VS The Secretary M/o Education & Ors (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 3315/2020
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar
- Length
- 4 pages
Summary from the court's website
We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Secretary Education, Government of Sindh and Secretary Education Department Government of Punjab, jointly and severally, to pay all her perks and privileges to which she was entitled to by issuance of notification of her retirement, inclusive of her entire pensionary benefits within two (02) months and report compliance through MIT-II of this Court.
Full judgment
Official copyOrder Sheet
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH KARACHI
Constitutional Petition No. D –3315 of 2020 Before:
Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Mst. Zarina Anwar Versus The Secretary Ministry of Education and 04 others
Date of hearing & order : 10.12.2020
Mr. Babar Ali Shaikh, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, Assistant A.G Sindh along with Riaz Ahmed, Assistant Accounts Officer, Accountant General Sindh & Jawed Ali Khawaja, Litigation Officer, SELD.
ORDER
ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J., Through this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to the respondents to issue notification of her retirement and award to her pensionary benefits on the premise that she was appointed as PTC Teacher (BPS-07) in Government Girls Primary School Tambo, Ghalib Shah Tehsil Pasru District Sialkot Government of Punjab and after 15 years of service in the Department of Education, she was sent on deputation to the Department of Education and Literacy, Government of Sindh. According to her, she continued her job in Education and literacy department, Government of Sindh, and stood retired from her service in the year 2017. Her grievance is that the Government of Sindh / Government of Punjab is avoiding to release her pension.
2.Mr. Babar Ali Shaikh, learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that post- retirement benefits of the petitioner are her inalienable fundamental rights guaranteed by the Constitution, cannot be withheld or delayed on the ground of whatsoever, especially when the same is her only source of income after retirement.
3.Learned AAG in principle has accepted the stance of the petitioner, however, he emphasized on his para-wise comments and argued that the petitioner will have to approach her parent department i.e. Education Department, Government of Punjab and in such an event, length of her service in the Government of Sindh will also be taken into consideration.
4.We have noticed that despite service upon respondent No.3 they deliberately failed and neglected to appear to assist the Court on the subject
issue, more particularly to defend their case, leaving this Court with no choice but to proceed with this matter in their absence.
5.We have heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned AAG and perused the material available on record.
6.The important question involved in the present proceedings is that whether Education Department, Government Sindh (borrowing department) has to prepare the pension papers of the petitioner or her parent department i.e. Education Department, the Government of Punjab.
7.To answer the proposition, regarding the preparation of pension papers of Government servants on deputation to other departments, in case of a permanent employee, the papers have to be prepared by the Ministry/Division/ Department/Office in which he/she held a substantive appointment.
8.Prima-facie, the petitioner was initially appointed as PTC Teacher (BPS-
07)in Government Girls Primary School Tambo, Ghalib Shah, Tehsil Pasru, District Sialkot, Government of Punjab vide appointment letter dated 09.03.1981. She was granted senior grade in BPS-10 vide office order dated 01.01.1992 and further move over in BPS-11.
9.We have noticed that in the year 2004 she was transferred to the Education Department, Government of Sindh, on deputation on wedlock policy. Her deputation period was extended by the Sindh Government from time to time and finally, she attained the age of superannuation in the year 2017. In the meanwhile, the petitioner requested the respondents to pay her retirement dues, whereby the respondent-Education Department, Government of Sindh, vide office order dated 29.04.2019 directed the petitioner to approach her parent department i.e. Government of Punjab, Education Department (School Wing), Punjab Civil Secretariat, Lahore, for claiming her retirement emoluments / benefits.
10.Admittedly the petitioner was not on the permanent strength of the Sindh Government’s service because her initial appointment was made by the Education Department, Government of Punjab, as she was working on deputation in Sindh Government since 28.12.2004 till she reached the age of superannuation. Her retirement case was referred to the Education Department, Government of Punjab by the Director Schools Education vide letter dated Page 2 of 4
11.We have noticed that at the time of her deputation there was understanding between the petitioner and respondent- Education Department i.e. Government of Punjab and Government of Sindh that her G.P Fund and pensionary liabilities shall be shared by them respectively. An excerpt of the letter dated 16.08.2004 is reproduced as under:
“No.SO B-III (SGA&CD)7-28/2004
GOVERNMENT OF SINDH
SERVICES GENERAL ADMINISTRATION
AND COORDINATION DEPARTMENT
New Sindh Secretariat Building – I Shahrah-e-Kamal Attaturk Karachi – 74200 (Regulation Wing) Karachi dated the 16th August,2004 To,
The Secretary to Govt. of Punjab, Education Department (Schools Wing) Punjab Civil Sectt:
Lahore
Sub: INTER-PROVINCIAL TRANSFER OF MST. ZARINA ANWAR, OTC
TEACHER, FROM PUNJAB TO SINDH PROVINCE, ON DEPUTATION
BASIS.
I am directed to refer to you letter No.SO (S.IV)8-16/2004, dated 17.04.2004, on the above subject and to convey the no objection of Govt. of Sindh to the proposed transfer, on deputation basis, for initial period of 3(three) years, in respect of Zarina Anwar, OTC Teacher, GGPS Raipur Markaz Sabaz Pir, Tehsil Pasroor, District Sialkot from Punjab to Sindh Education Department, subject to the following terms and conditions:-
i. She will join at their own expenses.
ii. This Province/Department shall not pay any TA/DA. iii. No deputation allowance shall be made.
iv. GP Fund/pensionary liabilities will be shared by the respective Governments.
v. The Education Deptt. Shall pay salary to the deputationist as per LPC of the incumbent.
vi. The incumbent shall automatically be deemed repatriated after completion of deputation period.
vii. The period of deputation is 3 (three) years.
2.If the above mentioned terms and conditions are acceptable to Govt. of Punjab as well as Mst. Zarina Anwar, she may be relieved of her duties and directed to report to Sindh Education Department, Karachi for her posting/adjustment, under intimation to this Department.
Sd/- (Muhammad Ali) Section Officer (REGP: III)”
12.We in the circumstances are constrained to direct Secretary Education, Government of Sindh and Secretary Education Department Government of Punjab, jointly and severally, to pay all her perks and privileges to which she was Page 3 of 4
entitled to by issuance of notification of her retirement, inclusive of her entire pensionary benefits within two (02) months and report compliance through MIT- II of this Court.
13.This petition stands disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Shahzad*
Page 4 of 4
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC MPK 174 · 28 Jan 2026 Obaisa Mangrio (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2019 PLC (CS) 1100 · 4 Oct 2017 Dr. Uzma Shaheen Pirzada (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
- Lahore High Court · 2021 LHC 8638 · 8 Nov 2021 Kousar Parveen vs Gop (Secretary Edu) etc.
- Islamabad High Court · 2021 PLC(CS) 777 · 11 Dec 2020 Nusrat Rasheed & others VS FOP, etc
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 262 · 4 Feb 2026 Ahsan ul Iqbal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)