Sindh High Court

Mst. Fakhar un Nisa (Petitioner) VS Chief Sect: and Ors (Respondent)

Case
Const. P. 5585/2020
Type
Writ Jurisdictions
Bench
Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Length
1 page

Full judgment

Official copy

Order Sheet

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. D –5585 of 2020 Before:

Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Mst. Fakhr-un-Nisa Versus The Chief Secretary, Government of Sindh and 03 others Date of hearing & order : 09.11.2020 Mr. J. K. Jiskani, advocate for the petitioner.

ORDER

ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J. This petition is virtually for the assumption of the charge against the post of Vice-Principal Male School of Nursing, Sindh Government Hospital, Liaquatabad, Karachi vide notification dated 16.03.2020. It is stated on behalf of the petitioner that, basically the respondent No.3 is not relinquishing the charge of the aforesaid post to comply with the direction of Secretary Health, Government of Sindh.

2.We asked the learned counsel how this petition is maintainable on the premise that it is not the function of this Court to execute the notifications or orders of Secretary Health, Government of Sindh or to direct the respondent No.3 to handover the charge of the aforesaid post to the petitioner. His only reply is that the petitioner has approached this Court for enforcement of the notification dated 16.03.2020.

3.We are not satisfied with his reply for the reason that petitioner is a Civil Servant and she can approach the competent forum for enforcement of her posting order dated 16.03.2020. Reference may be made to the case of Peer Muhammad v. Government of Baluchistan and others, 2007 SCMR 54. Therefore, the forum chosen by the petitioner by invoking the Constitutional Jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution is not proper under the law. On the aforesaid proposition, the recent decision dated 16.1.2020 of the Hon'ble Supreme Court passed in Criminal Appeal No.622 of 2019 is clear in its terms. Consequently, the instant petition being meritless stands dismissed in limini along with the listed application(s). However, the petitioner will be at liberty to approach the proper forum under the law, if she is so advised.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Shahzad*

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Please confirm