Sindh High Court
Hafiz Jawad Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Bail 1271/2020
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT,
HYDERABAD
Criminal Bail Application No.S-1271 of 2020
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
1.For orders on office objections.
2.For hearing of main case.
Mr. Ali Asghar Mangi, Advocate for applicant.
Ms. Sobia Bhatti, A.P.G for State.
Irshad Ali Shah J.- It is alleged that the applicant committed rape with Pw Mst. Saba, for that the present case was registered by complainant Mst. Shabana.
2.The applicant on having been refused post-arrest bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge-IV, Dadu has sought for the same from this Court by way of instant application under section 498 Cr.P.C.
3.It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant being innocent has been involved in this case falsely by the complainant due to matrimonial dispute; the FIR has been lodged with delay of more than two months; DNA report is in negative;
complainant Mst. Shabana and PW Mst. Saba have already recorded no objection to grant of bail to the applicant by filing their affidavits before learned trial Court. By contending so, he sought for pre-arrest bail for the applicant on point of further enquiry.
4.Learned Assistant Prosecutor General for the State has opposed to grant of post-arrest bail to the applicant by contending that the offence alleged against him is affecting the society.
5.I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
6.The FIR of the incident has been lodged with delay of about more than two months; such delay having not been explained plausibly could not be overlooked. The DNA report is in negative. Complainant Mst.Shabana and PW Mst.Saba have already recorded no objection to grant of bail to the applicant by filing their respective affidavits before learned trial Court. In these circumstances, a case for grant of bail to the applicants on point of further inquiry is made out.
7.In view of above, the applicant is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing surety in sum of Rs.50,000/-and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.
8.The instant application is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa,
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1178 · 13 Jan 2021 Ranjan (Applicant) VS THe State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1663 · 2 Nov 2020 MST.HIRA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 452 · 3 Mar 2021 Ali Raza Shah (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 682 · 9 Nov 2020 Jeo s/o Chando (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1092 · 8 Mar 2021 Allah dino (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)