Sindh High Court
WASEEMULLAH KHAN GUJJAR (Applicant) VS IIND A.D.J SANGHAR & OTHERS (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Misc. 364/2020
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Summary from the court's website
The parties admittedly are disputed over the possession of landed property. Perhaps, in that context, learned Ex-officio Justice of Peace/Sessions Judge, Badin has declined to issue direction to police record FIR of the applicant by way of impugned order, which is not calling for any interference by this Court by way of instant Criminal Misc. Application.
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.
Cr. Misc. Appln. No.S- 364 of 2020
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
1.For orders on office objection
2.For hearing of main case.
Mr. Muhammad Sadique Buledi, advocate for applicant. Ms. Safa Hisbani, A.P.G for the State.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the proposed accused by way of maltreatment have attempted to dispossess the applicant from the land in his possession, which was constituting a cognizable offence, yet learned Ex-officio Justice of Peace/Sessions Judge, Badin has declined to issue direction to police to record FIR of the applicant by way of impugned order, same being illegal is liable to be set-aside by this court by way of instant Criminal Misc. Application u/s 561-A Cr.P.C.
Learned A.P.G for the State by supporting the impugned order has sought for the dismissal of the instant Criminal Misc. Application.
I have considered the above argument and perused the record.
The parties admittedly are disputed over the possession of landed property. Perhaps, in that context, learned Ex-officio Justice of Peace/Sessions Judge, Badin has declined to issue direction to police record FIR of the applicant by way of impugned order, which is not calling for any interference by this Court by way of instant Criminal Misc. Application, it is dismissed accordingly with an advise to the applicant to have a recourse u/s 200 Cr.P.C.
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 11 Feb 2019 Muhammad Usman Khan (Applicant) VS IInd ADJ / Ex-Officio Justice of peace Badin (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 453 · 15 Mar 2021 Shahzeel Memon (Applicant) VS Learned 1st ADJ Badin and others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1192 · 10 Mar 2021 Muhammad Asif (Applicant) VS Ld. Session Judge Badin & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 950 · 12 Oct 2020 Nazar Ali (Applicant) VS Ld. Session Judge Badin (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 125 · 6 Nov 2020 GHULAM MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS A.D.J & EX OFFICIO JUSTICE OF PEACE MATLI & OTHERS (Respondent)