Sindh High Court
SURESH KUMAR & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Bail 59/2021
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.
Cr.B.A.No.S- 59 of 2021
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
1.For orders on office objection.
2.For hearing of main case.
Mr. Mian Taj Muhammad Keerio, advocate for applicants. Mr. Shahid Ahmed Shaikh, D.P.G for the State.
Irshad Ali Shah J;- It is alleged that the applicant with rest of the culprit was found transporting huge quantity of Gutka and Main puri an injurious / poisonous substance intending to spread infection / disease likely to be dangerous / poisonous to human lives, for that the present case was registered.
2.The applicants on having been refused post arrest bail by learned Incharge Sessions Judge, Umerkot have sought for the same from this Court by way of instant application u/s 497 Cr.P.C.
3.It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants being innocent have been involved in this case falsely by the police; there is no independent witness to the incident; the property has been subjected to chemical examination with considerable delay. By contending so, he sought for release of the applicants on bail on point of further enquiry.
4.Learned A.P.G. for the State has opposed to release of applicants on bail by contending that the offence alleged against the applicants is affecting the society at large.
5.I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
6.There is no independent witness to the incident despite advance information to the police, which appears to be significant. Only eleven packets of the alleged susbstance have been subjected to chemical examination that too with considerable delay. The offence alleged against the applicants is not falling within prohibitory clause of section 497(2) Cr.P.C. The case has finally been challaned and there is no apprehension of tempering with the evidence on the part of applicant. In these circumstances a case for release of the applicants on bail on point of further enquiry obviously is made out.
7.In view of above, the applicants are admitted to bail subject to their furnishing solvent surety in the sum Rs.100,000/-each and PR bond in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court.
8.The instant bail application is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa,
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 643 · 1 Mar 2021 MUMTAZ (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 475 · 8 Feb 2021 Said Muhammad and another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 380 · 1 Mar 2021 Waseem Khan & another (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1326 · 5 Mar 2021 ALI AHMED @ SADORO & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 493 · 1 Mar 2021 JAISA RAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)