Sindh High Court
Saddam Hussain (Petitioner) VS V.C University Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 438/2020
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Senior Pusine Mr. Justice Nadeem Akhtar, Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan
- Length
- 1 page
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD
C.P. No.D-438 of 2020
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
1.For orders on office objection
2.For hearing of main case
Mr. Taj Muhammad Khan Kaimkhani advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Kamaluddin advocate for the respondents along with Ghulam Mustafa Siyal, Controller of Examination, University of Sindh Jamshoro.
The petitioner who, had appeared in the 3 rd year LLB examination, is aggrieved by the decision of the ‘Examination Discipline Committee’ whereby all the seven (07) papers in which he had appeared were cancelled on the ground that he was found copying / cheating in Paper-III. It is urged that the above Committee did not provide any opportunity of hearing to the petitioner before taking the impugned decision. It is also urged that if the allegation against the petitioner was correct, which has all along been vehemently denied by him, even then only Paper-III ought to have been cancelled instead of cancelling all seven (07) papers. Since the entire future and career of the petitioner are at stake, we are of the view that a fair opportunity of hearing ought to have been granted to him by the respondents before taking any coercive action against him. Ghulam Mustafa Siyal, Controller of Examination, University of Sindh Jamshoro, who is present in Court, has no objection if the matter of the petitioner is decided afresh after affording opportunity of hearing to him.
By consent, the impugned decision of cancellation of all seven (07) papers of the petitioner is hereby set aside ; and, the respondents and the Examination Discipline Committee are directed to convene a meeting of the Committee within ten (10) days from today wherein a fair opportunity of hearing shall be granted to the petitioner and his matter shall be decided afresh. Let notice be issued to all the respondents for compliance.
The petition stands disposed of in the above terms with no order as to costs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Ali Haider
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SBLR Sindh 1682 · 31 Jan 2018 Naseeb Ahmed Dhoon and Ors (Petitioner) VS The Vice Chancellor, University of Karachi and Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC KHI 1143 · 3 Sep 2021 Salman Sultan and Others (Petitioner) VS Vice Chancellor Karachi University & Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SBLR Sindh 1804 · 9 Aug 2018 Dr. Imran Ali Hashmi (Petitioner) VS The University of Karachi & Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2024 SHC KHI 1372 · 31 Jan 2024 Muhammad Fahad & Ors (Petitioner) VS Provincial Higher Education Commission & Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2022 SHC HYD 804 · 24 May 2022 Rahim Bux (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors. (Respondent)