Sindh High Court
Najubullah (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Rev 24/2020
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah, Mr. Justice Khadim Hussain Tunio
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.
Cr. Rev. A. No.D- 24 of 2020
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
For orders on office objections For hearing of main case.
Mr. Aijaz Bhutto, Advocate for applicant.
Mr. Shahnawaz Brohi, Special Prosecutor ANF.
The facts in brief necessary for disposal of instant Criminal Revision Application are that Toyota Corolla Car bearing Registration No.ALL-922 was used for transporting 20 kg of the Charas and 05 kg of the Opium by the culprits involved in such incident, for that a case was registered.
2.On conclusion of the trial, the culprits involved in the above said incident were convicted accordingly while the subject Car was confiscated in favour of State by learned Special Judge (CNS)/MCTC-I, Hyderabad vide property order dated 12.11.2020, which is impugned by the applicant before this Court by making the instant Criminal Revision Application.
3.It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is lawful owner of the subject Car; he has nothing to-do with the alleged incident and the subject Car has been confiscated by learned trial Court by way of impugned order without providing him chance of hearing, therefore, the impugned order being illegal is liable to be set-aside with direction to police to restore the custody of subject Car to the applicant.
4.Learned Prosecutor for ANF has sought for dismissal of instant Criminal Revision Application by contending that the subject Car was used in commission of incident and has rightly been confiscated in favour of State by learned trial Court.
5.We have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
6.Admittedly, no chance of hearing has been provided to the applicant by learned trial Court prior to recording confiscation of the subject Car in favour of State, which is contrary to the mandate contained by Article-10(A) of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973, which prescribed fair trial to every citizen for determination of his Civil / Criminal rights and obligations.
7.In view of above, the property order to the extent of confiscation of the subject Car is set-aside with direction to learned trial Court to pass the same afresh after providing chance of hearing to all the concerned.
8.The instant Criminal Revision Application is disposed of in above terms.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 23 Jan 2018 Abdul Aziz Gupchani (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1245 · 25 Feb 2021 Muhammad Moosa (Applicant) VS The State & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 31 Jan 2018 Imam Ali (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 109 · 4 Aug 2020 Chutto Khan (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 119 · 8 Mar 2021 MUHAMMAD NOMAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)