Sindh High Court
ALLAH DINO @ DINO & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Bail 459/2020
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD
Criminal Bail Application No.S-459 of 2020
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
For orders on office objections.
For hearing of main case.
Mr. Zaheeruddin Nohri, advocate along with applicants. Ms. Sobia Bhatti, A.P.G for the State.
Irshad Ali Shah, J:- It is alleged that the applicants with rest of the culprits in furtherance of their common intention caused hatchet and lathi blows to complainant Mubeen and his wife Mst. Walhan and then went away by setting his house on fire, for that the present case was registered against them.
2.The applicants on having been refused pre arrest bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tharparkar at Mithi have sought for the same from this Court by way of instant application under section 498 Cr.P.C.
3.It is contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants being innocent have been involved in this case falsely by the complainant party in order to satisfy its dispute with them over landed property and the FIR has been lodged with delay of nine days.
By contending so, he sought for pre-arrest bail for the applicants on point of further enquiry and malafide.
4.Learned A.P.G. for the State has opposed to grant of pre arrest bail to the applicants by contending that they have actively participated in commission of incident.
5.I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
6.The FIR of the incident has been lodged with delay of nine days;
such delay could not be overlooked. All the penal sections applied in the FIR are bailable excepting one u/s 436 PPC. The parties are said to be disputed over landed property. The case has finally been challenged. The applicants have joined the trial. In these circumstances, it is rightly being contended by learned counsel for the applicants that the applicants are entitled to grant of pre-arrest bail.
7.In view of above, the interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicants is confirmed on same terms and conditions.
9.The instant bail application is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa,
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 892 · 19 Jan 2021 ABDUL AZIZ & OTHERS (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1448 · 23 Nov 2020 MUMTAZ ALI & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 266 · 13 Jan 2021 Nadir Ali and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1346 · 13 Jan 2021 Abdul Sattar & others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1092 · 8 Mar 2021 Allah dino (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)