Ahmed Nadeem Chohan (Petitioner) VS Muhammad Ishaque Khan & another (Respondent)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT

COURT, HYDERABAD.

C.P No.S-386 of 2020

Petitioner : None for the petitioner.

Date of Order : 01.11.2021

ORDER

ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J:- Through the instant

petition, the petitioner has called in question the order dated 27.02.2020 passed by the learned 1st Senior Civil Judge / Rent Controller, Shaheed Benazirabad in Rent Application No.04 of 2017, whereby writ of possession has been issued against the petitioner in Execution Application No. 2 of 2018 to vacate the subject premises.

2.None present for the petitioner. No intimation is received. It appears from the record that after filing this petition, the petitioner has even failed to comply with the office objections. However, I have gone through the record as available before me and find that there are concurrent findings available against the petitioner, which do not require any interference of this Court in constitution Petition, which has limited jurisdiction to deal with the matter in like nature. I do not find any inherent flaw in the findings of both the courts below to upset their decisions through this petition. This petition is incompetent, which is accordingly dismissed with no order as to costs.

JUDGE

*Hafiz Fahad*