Sindh High Court
Muhammad Imran (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.J.A 117/2019
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan, Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyIN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT
HYDERABAD
Criminal Jail Appeal No.D-117 of 2019 Before;
Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
Appellant: Muhammad Imran Son of Muhammad Ramzan Bhatti, through Syed Zeeshan Hyder Rizvi, Advocate.
State: Mr. Shahid Ahmed Shaikh, DPG.
Date of hearing: 16.02.2021 Date of decision: 16.02.2021
JUDGMENT
IRSHAD ALI SHAH, J. The facts in brief necessary for disposal of instant appeal are that the appellant for an offence punishable under section 9 (c) of CNS Act, 1997 for being in possession of 2000 grams of Chars was convicted and sentenced to undergo R.I for four years and six months with fine of Rs.20,000/- and in default whereof to undergo S.I for five months by learned Special Judge CNS Sanghar, vide his Judgment dated 22nd May 2019, which is impugned by the appellant before this Court.
2.At the very outset, it is stated by learned counsel for the appellant that he would not press the disposal of instant appeal on merits, if the conviction/sentence awarded to the appellant by learned trial Court is reduced to one which is already undergone by him for the reasons that he is the only earning member of his family.
3.Learned D.P.G for the State readily accepted the proposal advanced by learned counsel for the appellant.
4.We have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
5.There is no independent witness to the incident. Only 70 grams of Chars has been subjected to chemical examination. The appellant is said to be the only earning member of his family and he has already suffered the agony of protracted trial for about three years. All these circumstances, collectively call for lenient action. As per jail roll furnished by the jail authorities the appellant has already undergone 02 years 07 months and 06 days of the substantial sentence and beside this he has also earned remission of 01 year, 05 months and 23 days, which appears to be sufficient punishment for the above said offence, in the circumstances of the case, therefore, the conviction/sentence awarded to the appellant is reduced to one which is already undergone by him with fine of Rs.5,000/- and in case of default whereof, he would undergo simple imprisonment for 15 days with benefit of section 382-B Cr.P.C.
6.The instant appeal is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Muhammad Danish Steno*
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1781 · 18 Nov 2020 MEHAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1874 · 18 Nov 2020 MEHAR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 2360 · 16 Dec 2020 Noor Muhammad (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 812 · 14 Jan 2020 Nadeem (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2022 SHC HYD 113 · 11 Oct 2022 GHULAM MUSTAFA (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)