Muhammad Ramzan (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD

C.P. No.D-233 of 2021

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

1.For orders on M.A. No.1334/2021 (urgent application) 2. For orders on office objection appearing on reverse of memo of petition 3. For orders on M.A. No.1335 /2021 (exemption application) 4. For hearing of main case

Mr. Muhammad Sachal R. Awan advocate for petitioner.

1.Urgency granted.

2to4. Work order dated 23.11.2017 (page 23) was awarded to the petitioner in respect of the work described therein. Thereafter, a fresh tender was issued by the respondents in respect of some additional work which was admittedly not part and parcel of the work awarded to the petitioner. It is also an admitted position that in the fresh bidding process for the said additional work, the present petitioner had also participated, but his bid was not accepted and the lowest bid of respondent No.5 was accepted whereafter the said fresh work was awarded to respondent No.5. Learned counsel for the petitioner has not been able to convince us regarding the locus standi of petitioner with regard to the fresh work / contract wherein he admittedly did not succeed in bidding. His only concern is that construction under the said fresh contract will damage and disturb the work done / to be done by the petitioner. In case of any such damage and/or interference, he may avail his remedy before the competent forum in accordance with law.

With this observation, the petition and listed application are disposed of with no order as to costs.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Ali Haider