Sindh High Court
Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 518/2022
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar, Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
- Length
- 1 page
Full judgment
Official copyIN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH KARACHI
Before:
Mr. Justice Aftab Ahmed Gorar Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon C.P. No. D-518 f 2022
Muhammad Ashraf Petitioner through : Mr. Munawar Alam Khan, advocate
Respondens through: : Mr. Al Safdar Depar, AAG alongwith Aziz Ahmed Hakro, Director (Information Legal), Government of Sindh.
Date of hearing & order : 07.02.2022
At the outset, learned AAG has filed notification dated 03.02.2022, whereby posting of respondent No.8 as Information Officer has been canceled/withdrawn. Be that as it may, we asked learned AAG under what law and authority respondent No.8 was allowed to work as Information Officer (BPS-17) Advertisement. Learned AAG replied to the query and submitted that respondent No.8 was the Senior Scale Stenographer, thus was entitled to promotion as Information Officer under the recruitment rules notified on 10.07.2020. We have gone through the notification dated 10.7.2020 whereby the post of Information Officer (BPS-17) is to be filled (a) fifty percent by initial appointment through Sindh Public Service Commission; and (b) Fifty percent by promotion as per ratio: (i) Fifteen percent by promotion from amongst the Superintendent (BPS-17); (ii) Fifteen percent by promotion from amongst the Senior Scale Stenographers (BPS-16); (iii) Fifteen percent by promotion from amongst the Computer Technician (BPS-16); and, (iv) Ten percent by promotion from amongst the Senior Translator (BPS-11) Note: Having at least 10 years length of service, on seniority-cum-fitness basis.
Prima facie, the respondents have not advertised the post of Information Officer (BS-17), which post is required to be filled through competitive process i.e. Sindh Public Service Commission and even the respondent-department has not applied the ratio of 15% by promotion from amongst the Superintendent (BPS-17) and directly jumped to the clause (a)(ii) of the recruitment rules, even the respondents have not considered the minimum academic qualification and experience for the subject post, which action on the part of respondent-department is not appreciated.
In view of the above, the respondents are directed to appoint the Information Officer (BPS-17) through a competitive process i.e. Sindh Public Service Commission under the recruitment rules and not otherwise. This petition stands disposed of along with pending application(s), in the above terms. Let a copy of this order be transmitted to the Secretary, Information Department, Government of Sindh, for compliance.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Nadir*
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2022 SHC KHI 336 · 7 Feb 2022 Hadi Bux Siyal (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 1 Apr 2019 Marvi Aslam & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 637 · 17 Apr 2025 Muhammad Kausar Noor (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2022 SHC KHI 754 · 22 Feb 2022 Muhammad Younus and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 8 May 2025 Shakil Ahmed Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)