Sindh High Court
Imtiaz Ali & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 491/2024
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
- Length
- 2 pages
Summary from the court's website
It appears from the record that petitioners are calling in question the Notice dated 04.10.2018 issued by the Assistant Commissioner/Assistant Director Anti Encroachment Taluka Hussain Bux Mari on the premise that the petitioners have titled documents in their favor issued by the Revenue authorities through registered sale deed and such Khatas are mutated in their names. If this is a position of the case, the issue involved in the proceedings can be resolved by the Anti Encroachment and/or competent Court of law as both the parties claim and counterclaim on the subject property.
Full judgment
Official copyIN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH
CIRCUIT COURT MIRPURKHAS
Constitutional Petition No.D-491 of 2024 (Imtiaz Ali & others vs. P.O Sindh and others)
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
Before Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J Amjad Ali Bohio, J
Date of hearing and order 09-09-2024
Mr. Afzal Karim Virk, advocate for the petitioners Mr. Ghulam Nabi Meo, advocate for intervener Mr. Ayaz Ali Rajpar, Additional A.G Sindh a/w Sajjad Ali Khaskheli Mukhtiarkar (Revenue) Hussain Bux Mari
ORDER
Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J. Through the instant Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, the petitioners have sought suspension of Notice dated 04.10.2018 issued by Assistant Commissioner/Assistant Director Anti Encroachment Mirpurkhas, whereby he had directed the demolition of houses of petitioners citing the land in question to be of Government property.
2.Learned counsel submits that he will challenge the Notice before the Anti Encroachment Tribunal Court or competent Court for redressal of his grievances.
3.Learned A.A.G. submits that the property in question is government property and this petition is not maintainable.
4.We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record with their assistance.
5.It appears from the record that petitioners are calling in question the Notice dated 04.10.2018 issued by the Assistant Commissioner/Assistant Director Anti Encroachment Taluka Hussain Bux Mari on the premise that the petitioners have titled documents in their favor issued by the Revenue authorities through registered sale deed and such Khatas are mutated in their names. If this is a position of the case, the issue involved in the
proceedings can be resolved by the Anti Encroachment and/or competent Court of law as both the parties claim and counterclaim on the subject property.
6.The instant petition stands disposed of in terms of the preceding paragraphs.
JUDGE
JUDGE
*Ali Sher*
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2023 SHC HYD 928 · 11 May 2023 Ghulam Mustafa & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 3219 · 29 Sep 2025 M/s. Al-Hashmi Brothers Thr Attorny Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 2417 · 19 Sep 2025 Shoukat Hussain & Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 767 · 1 Apr 2026 M/s. International Building Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 1611 · 19 Aug 2026 Muhammad Imran Akhter & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)