Sindh High Court
Muhammad Khalid Sheikh S/o Muhammad Yousuf Sheikh (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 198/2024
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
- Length
- 1 page
Summary from the court's website
Admittedly, this is the case of harassment at hands of police in connivance with private respondents. The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all ensure law and order to protect citizen???s life and property.
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
C.P No.S-198 of 2024 (Muhammad Khalid Sheikh v Province of Sindh & others)
Date Order With Signature Of Judge
Date of hearing and order 07.04.2025
None present for the Petitioner.
Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, AAG.
Mr. Qamaruddin Nohri, DPG along with DSP Raza Mian, DSP Legal-II, CPO, SIP Abdul Lateef.
ORDER
Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J: The Petitioner is the owner of the property i.e Flat No. M 318, on third Floor, Al-Ghafoor Aveue, plot No. FL-11 Sector 11- A, North Karachi; that property was rented out to the respondent No.06 on 20.02.2020 against the advance payment of Rs. 100,000/- and on monthly Rent of Rs. 12,000/- with enhancement of 10% on every year; that the montly rent was paid by the respondent No.06 till June 2023, thereafter the Respondent No.06 committed defult in payment and did not pay the monthly Rent from July 2023, hence the petitioner demand vacation of his property. The Respondents are acting in violation of constitutional provisions and illegally and unlawfully harassing the Petitioner with malafide intentions. The Respondents have committed offenses under the law through illegal harassment and threats against the Petitioner. Respondents No. 2 to 5 are duty-bound to initiate departmental and legal action against Respondents No. 6 in accordance with the law. The Petitioner avers that the actions of the Respondents are illegal, not permissible under the law, and unsustainable under the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. The impugned acts of the Respondents are ultra vires the legislative framework, inoperative, void, cnconstitutional, and unreasonable.
2.Admittedly, this is the case of harassment at hands of police in connivance with private respondents. The main objectives of police is to apprehend offenders, investigate crimes, and prosecute them before the cours also to prevent to commission of crime, and above all ensure law and order to protect citizen’s life and property.
3.Learned A.A.G. submits that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of on these terms.
JUDGE
Shafi
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 3217 · 29 Sep 2025 Muhammad Junaid s/o Muhammad Bachal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 3219 · 29 Sep 2025 M/s. Al-Hashmi Brothers Thr Attorny Muhammad Hanif (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 552 · 8 Apr 2025 Saifullah Jamali (Disable) (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 248 · 8 Apr 2025 Shaikh Osama Rafi S/o Shaikh Muhammad Rafi (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 3243 · 3 Nov 2025 Mst. Waheeda Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)