Sindh High Court

Ali Sher (Petitioner) VS Government of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Case
Const. P. 1119/2025
Type
Writ Jurisdictions
Judge
Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Length
1 page

Summary from the court's website

Petition stands disposed of with directions to the official respondents not to cause any sort of harassment to the petitioner. However, if there is a cognizable offence, the police shall be free to take action in accordance with law.

Full judgment

Official copy

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-1119 of 2025 Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1.For order on office objection Nos.1 and 2 alongwith reply as at “A” 2. For hearing of main case

Mr. Saadat Ali Jiskani advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, Assistant AG Mr. Mumtaz Ali Shah, Assistant PG Mr. Raza Mian, DSP (Legal-II) CPO DSP Mahboob Shah, Jatti Inspector Rafique, Local Person SSP Sujawal

Petitioner has filed this Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 with the following prayer:- To direct respondent Nos.2 and 3 to provide protection, as the life and liberty of the petitioner and other family members and relatives are deprived by the hands of respondent Nos.4 to 6.

This Court vide order dated 20.10.2025, issued notices to the respondents as well as to learned Advocate General Sindh and learned Prosecutor General Sindh for today. Official respondents / police officials are present in Court. They state that neither they have harassed the petitioner nor intend to do so. Learned AAG and learned APG also states that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner and the police officials present in Court shall act strictly in accordance with law.

Petition stands disposed of with directions to the official respondents not to cause any sort of harassment to the petitioner. However, if there is a cognizable offence, the police shall be free to take action in accordance with law.

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Please confirm