Sindh High Court
Mst. Saima & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 1156/2025
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
- Length
- 1 page
Summary from the court's website
This Court vide order dated 23.10.2025, issued notices to the respondents with directions to the SHO concerned to provide protection to the petitioners. Today, the private respondents are called absent without intimation. The SHO present in Court submits that due protection shall be provided to the petitioners. He is directed to obtain bond of Rs.500,000/- (Rupees five lac) each from the private respondents to the effect that no bodily harm shall be caused to the petitioners and the same bonds shall be kept at the police station and can be used against them if there is harm caused to the petitioners. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
Constitutional Petition No. S-1156 of 2025 Date Order with signature of Judge(s)
1.For order on office objection Nos.1 to 6 and reply as at “A” 2. For hearing of main case
Mr. Irfan Gul Memon advocate for the petitioners alongwith petitioners Mr. Ali Safdar Depar, Assistant AG Mr. Mumtaz Ali Shah, Assistant PG Ghulam Ahmed Shaikh, DSP / SDPO, Sukhan District Malir, Karachi PI Shaukat Ali Shar, PS Sukhan, District Malir, Karachi Inspector Ghulam Mustafa Solangi, SHO PS Jati, District Sujawal as well as on behalf of the SSP District Sujawal
Petitioners are present along with their counsel. It is inter alia contended that petitioner No.1 Mst. Saima has contracted marriage with petitioner No.2 Sudeer, against the wishes of her parents. Photo copies of Nikahnama and affidavit of freewill are annexed as annexures A and B along with petition. It is further submitted that private respondents No.7 to 23 being annoyed from the marriage of the petitioners are harassing them and there is serious apprehension that they may be killed as a Karo-Kari.
This Court vide order dated 23.10.2025, issued notices to the respondents with directions to the SHO concerned to provide protection to the petitioners. Today, the private respondents are called absent without intimation. The SHO present in Court submits that due protection shall be provided to the petitioners. He is directed to obtain bond of Rs.500,000/- (Rupees five lac) each from the private respondents to the effect that no bodily harm shall be caused to the petitioners and the same bonds shall be kept at the police station and can be used against them if there is harm caused to the petitioners. Petition stands disposed of in the above terms.
JUDGE
Zahid/*
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 2091 · 7 Sep 2020 Mst. Saima & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 31 Jan 2017 Mst. Saima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 1096 · 11 May 2026 Mst. Seema & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC SUK 209 · 10 Feb 2025 Mst Saima narejo (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 839 · 16 Apr 2026 Mst. Aliza & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)