Sindh High Court

Muhammad Nazim Khan and others (Petitioner) VS Prov. of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Case
Const. P. 664/2010
Type
Writ Jurisdictions
Bench
Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Mr. Justice Abdul Mobeen Lakho
Length
1 page

Summary from the court's website

Thereafter Miscellaneous Application has been moved and it was lastly fixed on 03.12.2015, thereafter, there is no progress and on the very date no body was in attendance on behalf of petitioner. This Court is left with no option but to dismiss the Miscellaneous Application for non-prosecution.

Full judgment

Official copy

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI

C.P. No.D-664 of 2010

Date Order with signature of Judge

For hearing of CMA No.794/2011

None present.

This petition was disposed of vide order dated 22.12.2010 in the following terms:-

“1)Learned Counsel Tor Respondent No.6 seeks time to file counter affidavit to this Application. Two weeks' time is granted.

2)Learned Counsel does not press this application, the same is consequently dismissed.

3)Mr. Zubair Hashmi has placed on record a copy of Note for Supercession of the society which is dated 10.01.2009. He has also placed copy of states Show Cause Notice dated that this Show Cause on record 20.04.2010 has Notice a and been as issued. Dr. Khalid Ali z. Qazi specifically denies receipt of the said Show Cause Notice, Be that the Show Cause Notice has been it may, copy given to Mr. Qazi. The Petitioner may submit reply Show to the thereafter. of Cause the Notice within Secretary LWO and weeks Cooperation Department shall decide upon the Show Cause Notice within a one month. This petition as well as CMA No.2580/2010 are disposed of in the above terms.”

Thereafter Miscellaneous Application has been moved and it was lastly fixed on 03.12.2015, thereafter, there is no progress and on the very date no body was in attendance on behalf of petitioner. This Court is left with no option but to dismiss the Miscellaneous Application for non-prosecution.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Aadil Arab

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Please confirm