Sindh High Court

Shama (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)

Case
Const. P. 386/2025
Type
Writ Jurisdictions
Bench
Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Length
1 page

Full judgment

Official copy

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. D-386 of 2025 (Shama versus Province of Sindh & others)

Date Order with signature of Judge Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi

For hearing of main case

Date of hearing and order: 20.2.2026

Mr. Mushtaque Ali Tagar advocate for the petitioner Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi, Assistant AG Mr. Asad Ahmed advocate for the respondent / KMC

ORDER

Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J. Petitioner Mst. Shama, has filed the instant petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, seeking directions to the respondents to release her pensionary benefits, remaining difference of monthly family pension as the same are not being paid to her despite her hectic efforts. Since the issue involved in the present case is with regard to release of the pensionary benefits, therefore, this Court vide order dated 03.2.2026, directed the respondents to release the pensionary benefits of the petitioner and pursuant to this Court’s order, a cheque No.25361601 dated 18.2.2026 amounting to Rs.1,940,751/- issued in favour of the petitioner / widow of Ahsan, Ex-Sanitary Worker (BPS-2), Town Municipal Corporation, New Karachi being the full and final payment on account of pension commutation (including pension arrears), whose husband retired from service on 14.8.2023. Learned counsel for the KMC submits that petitioner is also drawing monthly pension regularly vide Inward No.61775 dated 14.11.2025.

Learned counsel for the petitioner is satisfied with the aforesaid position of the case and seeks disposal of the instant petition in terms of the statement made by learned counsel for the respondent / KMC.

Petition stands disposed of

JUDGE

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Please confirm