Sindh High Court
Abdul Jabbar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 1397/2026
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
- Length
- 1 page
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI
C.P. No.D-1397 of 2026 (Abdul Jabbar versus Province of Sindh & others)
Date Order with signature of Judge
Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi Date of hearing and order:- 02.04.2026 Mr. Shahid Hussain, advocate for the petitioner.
Mr. Asad Ahmed, advocate for KMC.
Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi, AAG.
ORDER
Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J. – The petitioner Abdul Jabbar has filed the captioned Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, seeking following relief(s):-
“a. To declare that the petitioner is legally entitled for recovery of retirements benefits Gratuity etc. from the respondents and the respondents are bound to act under the framework provided in constitution of Pakistan and to obey the law being the statutory body incorporated under the provincial government.
b. To direct the respondents to release retirements benefits Gratuity etc. forthwith without committing any further delay as the respondents being statutory body is bound to act in accordance with law and recovery of dues is the fundamental right of the petitioner and respondent is bound under principle policy to do so.”
2.The petitioner was appointed as Ex-Machine Man BPS-2 in KMC on 01.07.1984, retired in 2023, but his pension benefits had not been released.
3.Learned counsel for KMC stated that the pension claim was received on 11.11.2025 and highlighted that, pursuant to this Court’s order dated 12.03.2025 in C.P No.3393/2023, the Secretary Sindh Local Government coordinated with TMCs to provide lists of retired employees and upcoming retirees to facilitate timely pension payments.
4.Today, KMC counsel confirmed that the petitioner’s pension claim, pre- audited at Rs.2,741,356/-, will be paid within three weeks.
5.Learned counsel for the petitioner agreed to dispose of the petition on this basis.
6.Without touching the merits of the case, the petition stands disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Shahzad Soomrop
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 1055 · 6 May 2026 Abdullah (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 449 · 20 Feb 2026 Muhammad Imtiaz Khan (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 1091 · 12 May 2026 Said Alam (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 1037 · 29 Apr 2026 Maqsood Masih and Others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 1157 · 19 May 2026 Suresh Kumar (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)