Sindh High Court

Danish Saeed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

Case
Const. P. 1552/2026
Type
Writ Jurisdictions
Bench
Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi
Length
2 pages

Summary from the court's website

In view of the above position, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, this petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction that the respondent department to forward the petitioner???s pension case to the office of the Accountant General within two weeks from the date of this order. Thereafter, a compliance report shall be submitted to this Court.

Full judgment

Official copy

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. D-1552 of 2026 (Danish Saeed versus Province of Sindh & others)

Date Order with signature of Judge

Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Mr. Justice Zulfiqar Ali Sangi

For hearing of main case

Date of hearing and order: 13.4.2026

Mr. Ghulam Shabbir Pathan advocate for the petitioner Mr. Abdul Jalil Zubedi, Assistant AG Mr. Munir Ahmed Shaikh, Accounts Officer, Accountant General Sindh Mr. Yar Muhammad Bozdar, D.S.-I LU, Board of Revenue Sindh Mr. Mushtaque Ali, Focal Person for Court, Board of Revenue

ORDER

Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, J. Petitioner Danish Saeed has filed this Constitutional Petition under Article 199 of the Constitution of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973, with the following prayer: - Direct the respondents No.2 and 3 to finalize the case of the petitioner for release of his pensionary benefits alongwith amount of commutation, payment of final G.P. fund amount alongwith 365 days encashment of leave and gratuity which have not been paid to the petitioner.

2.The petitioner was appointed as Assistant Commissioner (BPS-17) through a competitive examination in the year 1991. He was subsequently promoted to BPS-18 on the recommendations of the competent committee and, in due course, attained the rank of BPS-21. Upon reaching the age of superannuation, he retired from service as Member Judicial, Board of Revenue (BPS-21) on 30.09.2024, in pursuance of notification dated 20.03.2024.

3.It is submitted that, despite his retirement, the petitioner has not been granted his regular pensionary benefits. Although he has been receiving anticipatory pension since November 2025, the remaining pensionary dues have not been released as the concerned department, i.e., the Board of Revenue, has yet to forward his pension case to the Accountant General for necessary processing and compliance.

4.Learned AAG submits that within two weeks time the pensionary papers of the petitioner shall be forwarded to the office of Accountant General for releasing his service dues as per law. The request seems to be reasonable and acceded to.

5.In view of the above position, without touching the merits of the case and with consent of the parties, this petition is disposed of along with pending application(s) with the direction that the respondent department to forward the petitioner’s pension case to the office of the Accountant General within two weeks from the date of this order. Thereafter, a compliance report shall be submitted to this Court.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Please confirm