Sindh High Court

Arbab Ali Mahar (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)

Case
Const. P. 508/2023
Type
Writ Jurisdictions
Bench
Mr. Justice Arbab Ali Hakro, Mr. Justice Nisar Ahmed Bhanbhro
Length
6 pages

Summary from the court's website

A recruitment policy altered before the interview stage and applied alike to all operates prospectively; success in the written test confers no right to the post or to any weightage formula; and a candidate who appears under the changed process without demur cannot assail it after failing on merit.

Full judgment

Official copy

Advertisement published by WAPDA, Annex-B to the para-wise comments of respondents No.1 to 4.

PTS roll number slip and result, Annexes C and D to the petition.

C. P. No. D – 508 of 2023 Page 2 of 6

SOP-2018 dated 07.02.2018, Annex-B to the petition.

Office Order No.AD(E.IA)/7038/90/2020/16369-16468 dated 03.10.2022, Annex-E to the petition and Annex-C to the para-wise comments.

Letter dated 30.11.2022 of the Assistant Director (HR&Admn) Hydel, WAPDA, Annex-F to the petition.

C. P. No. D – 508 of 2023 Page 3 of 6

Proceedings of the shortlisting board for the post of Junior Engineer (Electrical), Sindh (Rural) quota, Annex-D to the para-wise comments.

C. P. No. D – 508 of 2023 Page 4 of 6

Federal Public Service Commission v. Shiraz Manzoor 2023 SCMR 2087.

Secretary Finance v. Ghulam Safdar 2005 SCMR 534; Waheed Gul Khan v. Province of Sindh 2024

SCMR 1701.

C. P. No. D – 508 of 2023 Page 5 of 6

Uzma Manzoor v. Vice-Chancellor, Khushal Khan Khattak University, Karak 2022 SCMR 694.

Government of Balochistan v. Muhammad Akhtar 2025 SCMR 656.

C. P. No. D – 508 of 2023 Page 6 of 6

Muhammad Ashraf Sangri v. Federation of Pakistan 2014 SCMR 157; Waheed Gul Khan (n.8 above).

Vice Chancellor, Shaheed Mohtarma Benazir Bhutto Medical University v. Altaf Hussain Somroo F.C.P.L.A. No.14 of 2025 (Federal Constitutional Court); Ghulam Safdar (n.8 above).

Waheed Gul Khan (n.8 above).

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Please confirm