Islamabad High Court
Commissioner Inland Revenue VS M/s Attock Refinery
- Case
- Sales Tax Reference-13-2013
- Type
- Sales Tax Reference
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb
- Length
- 2 pages
Summary from the court's website
Sales Tax Reference
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE ISLAMABAD HIGH COURT, ISLAMABAD
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
S.T.R.No.13 of 2013 Commissioner Inland Revenue (Zone-I), LTU, Islamabad Versus M/s Attock Refinery Limited, Rawalpindi S. No. of order Date of order/ Order with signature of Judge and that of parties or counsel / proceedings Proceedings where necessary. 18.04.2022 Mr. Saeed Ahmad Zaidi, Advocate for the petitioner.
The questions of law proposed for our consideration are as follows:- “(i) Whether the imposition of default surcharge under section 34 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 is mandatory are otherwise when default on account of non payment of principal amount has been established against the taxpayer and upheld by the learned Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue itself and the law also clearly provides for imposition of default surcharge irrespective of the fact whether the default is willful or not under section 34 of the Sales Tax Act, 1990.
(ii)Whether the imposition of penalty under section 33 of Sales Tax Act, 1990 is mandatory or otherwise when default on account of non payment of principal amount has been established against the taxpayer and upheld by the learned Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue itself.”
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that it was obligatory on the Department to impose default surcharge and penalty and that the Appellate Tribunal Inland Revenue (“A.T.I.R.”) was not vested with any discretion to waive default surcharge and penalty.
3.The record shows that the learned A.T.I.R. had set-aside the order of the Deputy Commissioner Revenue (Audit-V) to the extent of imposition of default surcharge and penalty because of a letter written to the taxpayer by the Superintendent of Customs Department advising that sludge falls under PCT Heading 2713-9000. The taxpayer’s case before the learned A.T.I.R.
was that sludge falls under PCT Heading 2713- 9000 whereas the Department’s position was that sludge falls under PCT Heading 2710-9900. Since there was a letter from the Superintendent of Central Excise Department to the effect that sludge falls under PCT Heading 2713-9000, we do not find any infirmity or illegality in the order dated 17.11.2011 passed by the learned A.T.I.R. whereby the order dated 22.01.2011 passed by the Commissioner Inland Revenue (Appeals-I), Islamabad was modified to the extent of setting- aside the imposition of default surcharge and penalty. Therefore, the instant reference is answered in the negative.
(ARBAB MUHAMMAD TAHIR) (MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB)
JUDGE JUDGE
Sultan*
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Lahore High Court · 2023 LHC 5946 · 26 Sep 2023 Commissioner Inland Revenue Vs Ms Rasool Nawaz Sugar Mills Ltd
- Sindh High Court · 2022 SHC KHI 705 · 6 May 2022 Commissioner I-R Zone-IV (Applicant) VS Byco Petroleum Pakistan Ltd. (Respondent)
- Islamabad High Court · 4 Feb 2025 M/s ADOS Pakistan Limited VS The Commissioner Inland Revenue etc
- Lahore High Court · 2026 LHC 1787 · 27 Jan 2026 Commissioner Inland Revenue Multan Vs Ms Northern Power Generation Company
- Islamabad High Court · 2021 PTD 1680 · 1 Feb 2021 M/s Attock Refinery Ltd VS Collectorate of Sales Tax & others