Muhammad Haroon etc. VS PARC etc.

Fonn Na: HCJD/C-|2t il",{/Jf,"fi SUEFr

Ir\ I ttE l$tatsatSap.fiI$H_CpIjB:],lst At{AmA

]UDICIAI DEPABIMEJIT

W.p. No. 404 of 2014

Mulramnrad l-laroon, etc, Vs lrARC, e[c,

1i. I'lu. ol Dntc of Orcltr with signature of Juclge and tlrat of : ul ilt:tl' order/ pafties or counsel where necessan/, r [)t.r-)i:r](:tlinq$ proctladings

l(). 21-03-2016. Mr G"lrl, Shah, advocate for the applicants.

The apPlication is allou;ed for the

reasons mentioned therein.

2, The office is directed to restore number' the main petition on its original

The lehrned counsel for the

malnlpetition

'9' In th'e.light of the above, service regulations of p.A.R.C, having been declared by the august Supreme Court as non-statutory, the relationship of the employees and p.A.R,C.

falls within the ambit of master and seruant rule.

7.irr the circumstances, the instant writ petition is misconceived and is, therefore, accordingly dlsmissed. t

Uploaded By: Engr. Umer Rasheed Dar