Islamabad High Court
Sikandar Hayat VS Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad etc
- Case
- Writ Petition-907-2021
- Type
- Writ Petition
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Miangul Hassan Aurangzeb
- Length
- 2 pages
Summary from the court's website
Petitioner is in tube well water supply business owing to water shortate in G-15, G-16, F-17 Seeks permission of license/permission of water supply to there area
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE ISLAMABAD HIGH COURT, ISLAMABAD
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
W.P. No.907 of 2021 Sikandar Hayat Versus Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad
S. No. of order/ Date of order/ Order with signature of Judge and that of parties or counsel proceedings proceedings where necessary. 08.03.2021 Barrister Qamar Hussain Sabzwari, for the petitioner.
Through the instant writ petition, the petitioner, Sikandar Hayat, seeks a direction to the respondent, Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad to issue a license to supply water from a tube well to the houses in Sectors G-15, G-16 and F-17, Islamabad.
2.Learned counsel for the petitioner drew the attention of the Court to an undated letter from the Water Supply Directorate of the respondent which shows that the petitioner had filed an application for the issuance of a license for filling water from tube wells into private tankers. The said application has not been decided as yet.
3.In the first paragraph of the writ petition, it has been pleaded that “the petitioner to the best of his efforts, provides supply of water through water tankers to the residents nearby including mosques.” This pleading shows that the petitioner is already carrying out the activity for which he is applied for a license.
4.The supply of water through private tankers without a license is unlawful. Unless a license in this regard is granted to the petitioner, he shall refrain from extracting water through a tube well and supplying it through tankers. The petitioner’s conduct of supplying water through tankers before his application is decided by the respondent disentitles him from any discretionary
/ equitable relief in the Constitutional jurisdiction of this Court.
5.In view of the above, the instant petition is dismissed in limine.
6.Office is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Mayor, Metropolitan Corporation Islamabad as well as the Chairman, Capital Development Authority.
(MIANGUL HASSAN AURANGZEB)
JUDGE
Sultan*
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Islamabad High Court · 2024 ILR 187 · 19 Mar 2024 Ibrar Hussain VS Additional Deputy Commissioner etc
- Sindh High Court · 2021 YLR 867 · 26 Jan 2021 Sardar Abdul Hameed (Petitioner) VS The Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC KHI 1634 · 19 Nov 2020 Abdul Qayoom (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 9 Feb 2017 Moulvi Iqbal Haider (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2023 SBLR Sindh 1493 · 18 Apr 2019 Muhammad Iqbal Kazi and others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh (Respondent)