Peshawar High Court
Khalid Khan etc Vs State etc
- Case
- Cr.M No. 152-P of 2017
- Type
- Criminal
- Length
- 3 pages
Summary from the court's website
Ss. 324/452/148/149 PPC, 497 CrPC. Role of indiscriminate firing attributed to 5 accused including lady. Element of exaggeration in charge.
Full judgment
Official copyJUDGMENT SHEET
IN THE PESHAWAR HIGH COURT, PESHAWAR
JUDICIAL DEPARTMENT
Bail Petition No.152 -P/2017
ORDER
Date of hearing: 27th February, 2017
Petitioner(Khalid & another): By: Mr.Arifullah Khan, Advocate.
Respondents:
State : By: Mr.Rab Nawaz Khan, AAG.
Complainant: By: Mr.Yousaf Ali, Advocate.
QAISER RASHID KHAN, J:- Accused/petitioners Khalid and Zeeshan alias Shan seek their release on bail in case FIR No.647, dated 12.11.2016, under Sections 324/452/148/149 PPC of Police Station S.I. Abdul Hameed Shaheed (Shabqadar), District Charsadda, with the allegations that they alongwith their co-accused had fired at the complainant party, with which, the complainant Mst. Imtiaza was hit and injured.
2.Arguments heard and the available record perused.
3.As per FIR, it was the complainant who
reported about the incident as to how while she alongwith her husband had come to the house of their daughter Mst.Shabana when the accused/petitioners accompanied by their co- accused entered the house and started firing at them with their respective weapons which resulted into firearm injury to her.
The motive was stated to be blood feud over women folk.
4.Though role of indiscriminate firing has been attributed to 5 accused including a lady but from the spot only 4 empties of 30 bore were retrieved which as per FSL report have been fired from one and the same 30 bore weapon. The complainant has only received a single firearm injury on her left thigh. Moreover, the husband of the complainant, barely 2 paces away from her, as per site plan, remained unscathed during the alleged indiscriminate firing session of the accused party and that too, when the motive has been stated to be blood feud in which the obvious choice of the accused party in such like matters is the male member.
Thus, the element of exaggerated charge cannot be ruled out.
As such taking a tentative assessment of the available record, I hold the accused/petitioners entitled to the concession of bail. -
4.Resultantly, this bail petition is allowed and the accused/petitioners are admitted to bail provided each one of them furnishes bail bonds in the sum of Rs.1,00,000/- (Rupees one lac), with two sureties, each in the like amount, to the satisfaction of the Illaqa/Judicial Magistrate who shall ensure that the sureties are local, reliable and men of means.
5.Above are the reasons of my short order of the even date vide which petitioners have been admitted to bail.
6.Needless to mention that the observations recorded in this order are tentative in nature and shall not prejudice the proceedings before the learned trial court where the case be decided on its own merits after recording evidence.
Announced on 27th Febuary,2017.
JUDGE
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Peshawar High Court · 2013 YLR 42 · 17 Aug 2012 Mukhtiar vs Mian Gul Jan
- Peshawar High Court · 2017 YLR 2472 · 1 Feb 2016 Khail Khan vs State etc
- Peshawar High Court · 2018 PCrLJ Note 138 · 9 Mar 2018 Abdul Rashid & another Vs The State etc
- Peshawar High Court · 2018 YLR Note 127 · 3 Aug 2017 Saifullah Vs The State
- Peshawar High Court · 2018 MLD 398 · 11 Aug 2017 Khalid Vs The State