Peshawar High Court
Noor Zaman Vs The State
- Case
- Cr.MBA. No. 834-A of 2018
- Type
- Criminal
- Length
- 4 pages
Summary from the court's website
S. 497(2) CrPC S. 377/511 PPC. Occurrence had taken place at an unknown time and the case was registered after inquiry under section 157(1) CrPC. No visible abrasions were found on the person of victim by the doctor. case of further inquiry.
Full judgment
Official copy\'w ( JUDGMENT STIIIli'f
I)ESIIAWAIT HI GII COUR.T , Alllt o't'1'AI] AI) I}[.,NCTI .I T] DICIAL I)EI'AIi.TM IiNl' C r. M isc. l].A.N o.tt3il-A/20 I tt alongwith Cr.M No.9l 5-A/20I ti'
.TUDGMIINI'
l)rrla ol hcurin 3 26-1I-20l8
l)el il ioner (s) ln-oor Zuman) by ('htrudhury,4bdur' llntl ('hohan.,4dt,otut e......
lle .spo ndtnl (.;) il'he Stuttt et(') b.t l'LS .\urdur lvluhutnmud lsif .11(i trnd l'lus'u Khtrn, /tlt,oto/e......
SYI.,I) MI.JIIAMMAI) A]"r't0rJr,l sllAIt. .f .- Accusccl-pctitioncr, Noor /.anaq sccks his post arrcsL bail in casc Illl No.47, datcd 24.03.2018 undcr scctions 324 34 ctl- l)akistan I)cnal (]odc, l8(r0 and scctiorr 15 nn, Kl)K, rcgistcrcd al l)olicc Station Ilanna Al lai, I)istrict []altagrarr.
2 l'hc allc-qation againsl thc accuscd- pctitioncr, as rcvcals lrom thc rcport o1'Mahrj fatullah, conrplainant is l-hat hc alongwith his co-accr.rscd (jr.rl Zaman atl.cmptccl at his lilc as wcll as li[c oi'his son ( wasccnr on 2..1.03.2018 at 0it.30 houls in thcil horrsc
(: situatcd in villagc l)ashkal Nchr, within thc crin.rir.ral .iurisdiction o{' I)o1icc Statiorr IJanna Allai, l}attagram, bv ll rin s at thcm
l Argumcnts o[- thc lcarnccl counscl lbr thc partics hcald iind thc rccord pcrrrscd with thcir vaIuab]c assistancc.
1 No doubt, tl-rc prcscnt acc uscd/pctitioncr iras bccn clilcctly chargcd in thc prcscnt casc lirr [lrin!.
at l"hc complainant, howcvcr, rccord o1' thc casc lcvcals that co-accuscd (iul Zaman has bccr"r rclcascd on bail bv this Court vidc ordcr datcd 23.01 .2018 'Ihc prosccr-rlion has not cxplaincd thc clclay ol'abor-rt trvo ancl hali' hours in lodging thc l;.1.R. 'l'hc compLainant in tris rcport clcarll, mcntionccl thc narncs o1'two pcrsons i.c. thc prcscnt accusccl/pclilioncr and lris co-accusccl Oul /.atnan lirr comrnissior-r ol- o['l'cncc.
howcvcr', latcr on, hc discloscd thc narnc ol- Zaman son Nazir and chargcd hirn bcirrg co-accuscd, in his sr-rpplc nr cn tary stalcmcnt rccordcd on 05.04.20 I U, alict' tu'clvc da1,5 91'thc occurrcncc. As obscrvcd by this (loLrrt, r,r'hilc allowing bail pctition o1'co-accuscci, that statcmcnl. ol injurcd Wasccm was also rccordccl aItcr-trvclvc clays ol'thc occurrcncc, on 05.04.201tJ but no cxplanation has bccn givcn lor such dclay. It r,i,as ( lright occulrcncc and no sourcc o1 light has bccn
rrcntioncd by thc complainant. l'hc Mcdical ol'llccr also liiuncl blackcning around thc wounds, whicl-r could not bc possiblc li'om a distancc o1' 10 I-cct, as shown by thc l.O. in thc sitc plan bctwccr.t point No.1 arrd 5. l'hc ' kalashinkov' was not rccovcrccl on thc pointation ol'accusccl, rathcr it was shou'n to havc bccn rccovcrcd liorn thc housc of'accuscd/pctitioncr alicl cightccn ciays o1- occumcncc and scparatc casc rvas rcgistcrcd vidc |.1.R No.60 clatcd 10.04.2018, thus, thc cvidcntiary valuc o1' thc said rccovcry ilncl posirivc rcport o[' liircarms lixpcrt wou]d bc dctcnnincd by thc lcarncd trial Courl alicl rccording cvidcr-rcc oi' lhc plosccution. Mrlrcovcr, thc invcstigation in tl-rc casc is cornplctc and thc accuscd/pctiti<incr is no morc rcquircd to thc policc or' prosccr"rtion lbr Iurthcr invcstigation. In vicw ol' pcculiar I'acts and circumslanccs, thc casc ol thc ac cuscd/pctiLio ncr', prima .fbcie, bccomcs that o1' 'filrlher incluiry', as cnvisagcd in scction 497 (.2) (l'.1).(.
'l'i-rc obscrvations rcndcrcd hcrcinabovc.
arc tcntativc in naturc and it would nol- prcjudicc thc nrind o1' thc lrial Court in any manncr whatsocvci', during trial o1'thc casc.
I\
C (r. Oonscqucntly, this bait application as wcll as Cl.M No.9l5-Al2O15,lilcd by thc accuscd/ pctil.ioncr ibr acldition of scction l5 AA KI)K' arc acccptccl, accuscd-pctitioncr is admittcd to bail in thc
abovc ol'l'cnccs, subjcct to his turnishing bail bonds.irr lhc sutr ol'its.2.00,000/- (liupccs lrvo lacs), with two surctics cach it"t thc likc an-rount, to Lhc satisl'action o1' I I l u c1 u I l)trLy .l udi cial Magistratc, llattagram' t)r.26-l l-20llt. .r
//-/Z
i' r) (; ri
t\tJ) \1t )15 /tr.\tu] .\ltthttnDtu l )tttqtk'.\hnlt
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Peshawar High Court · 2019 YLR N 61 · 22 Oct 2018 M.Aslam VS The State
- Peshawar High Court · 2019 YLR N. 44 · 29 Oct 2018 Noor Ur Rehman Vs The State
- Peshawar High Court · 2019 PCrLJ N 73 · 30 Oct 2018 Asad Vs The State
- Peshawar High Court · 2024 YLR 2127 · 20 Apr 2023 Mubashir Ahmad Vs The State
- Peshawar High Court · 2019 YLR 1208 · 16 Oct 2018 Muhammad Javed Vs State