Peshawar High Court
Qazi Asfand Yar Vs Federation of Pakistan
- Case
- W.P. No. 995-A of 2018
- Type
- Constitutional
- Length
- 4 pages
Summary from the court's website
Art. 199 Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973. COMSATS Institute of Information Technology Regulations relating to Undergraduate Degree Programe, 2006.... exercising writ Jurisdiction in the affairs of the admission and examination is not warranted.
Full judgment
Official copyJUDGMENT SHI'T.,1'
PIiSIIAWAI{ IIIGH C OURT. AI}I}O'T'IAI}AI) I}EN CII
.I U I)ICI AL I)EPAITI'M I.] N'I'
Writ l'ctition No.995-A ot 20lti
.IUDGMEN'T
l.)ata o/ hecrri ng 0l ll.20l8 Pelitictner(s:1 ... (Qozi ,'ls/and )'ar) b\; [y'7'. l,luhantntutl ,1.si/ Qazi. ldt,oculc... ... ...
lla.s:pontlent(s)...(l"ederul (lovernmenl of Pukistan throttglt ,\e cretarl, Science & ltthnologl.. Islamubad etc )...... .......
SYI]I) MUTIAMMAD ATI'I LlE SIIAIT I 'l l"rror-r-ul-r instant pctition, thc pctitiorrcr approachcd 'l99 of thc (lonstilution ol' this (lourt undcl Articlc
Islarrric itcpublic o1' [)akistar.r, l9'i.\. rvith tiic lirllou,ing praycr:-
"lt is, thereJbre, humhll' PraYed thut on ucceptunce ttJ instunl wril petition, the direclions m{4' gruciouslY be given trt llte respondents .fbr including lltc murks ol second sessiontl of' t:nglish ComPrchension und Composition Course No. IIUll4 t 00 in existing tnuris und rcmoving ull lhe ltirt:!Y*t'ri:t , ohslot:la onl tachniculi!ies .frtt*t thc L't,nlinuuliott t.i ItL'lilit)tt(t' t
Etlttctttion ts t ragular stttdent ttf' .{ifih temester in Il.S lilectrical ({-ompute.r) Iingineerirtg in C CO M Stl'fS lJ n ivers i4; A b h ottuhutt
or ony olher relic/ whit'lr this Ilonouruble Courl tleems proper und uppropritte ./itr conlinuutiott o/ pelilioner's educulion muJ' kindly he grantel. "
a In csscncc, thc gricvancc ol' thc pctitioncr is that marks o1- sccond scssit)nal o1' l:nglish Con.rprchcnsion and Oomposilion (lor-rrsc No. I lunr 100 wcrc not includcd in thc cxisting rlarl<s
'l'l-rc ) lcspondcnts \4'crc prLt to noticc. who contcstcd thc prcscnt writ pctition ancl also subntillc(l parawisc colrmcnts kr thc w it pctilion 1 Algumcnts ol'thc lcarnccl couttscl lirr- thc partics hcard ancl rccot'd pcruscd -5 ['crusal ol rccord would rcvcal that studics o1' thc sludcnts arc govcrncd undcr thc 'l'cchnology COMSA'l S lnslitutc o1' Inlormation Il.cgulations rclaling 10 t.Jndcrgradr-ratc I)cgrcc I)rogratns, 2006, which providcs
"Standard o rrc ra ti n l)roccdurc tirr Studcnts S cholastic S ta tus: Wilh c{t'cct liom l;all 2005 onwat'ds, thc lirllori ing proccdurcs shall bc strictlY lollowcd Ibr Studcnts Scholastic Status b1' thc (llll systclll.
Gootl Acudenric Stund inr!
(GPS)
1\ studcnt shall bc classtltcrl ul good acadcmic standing il his/hcr GI'A ar.rd C(il)A do not {all bclow 2.0011.00.
Probution (PRB):
A studcnt shall bc placcd undcr probation il his/hcr (ll)A and C(il'}A lalls bclow 2.00/4.00 in a sclrcstcr.
Dismissal (DlS):
A sludcnt alrcady on probation sl'rall bc automatically disrnisscd liom sluclics i1' his/ hcr (il)A and C(il']A do no1 comc up to 2.00/4.00."
6.[t is cvidcnl fiom rccord that pctitioncr has obtaincd status of'clismissal as hc cor.rld no1. p.cl lhc rcquircd (ll)A and thc plca olthc pctitioncr is that thc said status o1- dismissal is duc to non-inclusion o1'his marks pcnaining 1o sccond scssional in cxistinLl nunrbcr / rlarks o1' linglish Comprchcnsion and composition coursc I Ium- 100.
'l'hc rccord urthcr f
lranspircs that thc pclitioncr has obtaincd t$'o sr.rcccssivc slatus of'probation in 3''l anrl 4'l' sclrcslr'fs ancl accordingly, in vicw o[' thc t'ulcs rcltrrccl Lo abovc, his status bccomc thal ol 'dismissal'' lhc pctitioncr has agitatcd an old issuc pct'tail-ttng to Lirc ycar 20 I 5 in thc prcscnt writ pctition lirr which lrc has subrr-rittcd no application 1o thc conccrncd authoritics sccl<ing inclusion ol- thc said marks lhc application t
H
anncxcd with thc pt'cscnt pclition carrics no datc as [o wl.rcn it was submittcd. At such bclatcd stagc, this (lourt in its constilutional cannot cnrbarl< upon thc controvcrsy, which would ccrtainly arnount to intcrl'crcncc in thc allairs ol' aclrrission and cxamination by this Oourt. Il.cliancc in this rcspcr:t is placcd on (2015 SCMIf 445) and (2016 SCMI{ l3,l).
1 Accordingly, thc instant writ pctition bcing rnisconccivccl slands disrlissccl tn limina Dr.ol.l t.21lt7 . ,t tJ !l
,t tl t,
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Peshawar High Court · 7 Nov 2018 Dr. Khalid Khan Vs Govt etc.
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 1176 · 31 Aug 2017 Muhammad Salik Nukrich and Ors (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 1175 · 31 Aug 2017 Shakil Sultan (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
- Peshawar High Court · 25 Sep 2018 Shaikh Rashid Vs Govt
- Peshawar High Court · 7 Nov 2018 Dr. Amjad Farooq Vs Govt