Ghulam Hussain (Applicant) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT,

HYDERABAD.

R.A.No. 147 of 2013

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

1.For orders on office objection.

2.For hearing of CMA 1099/2013.

3.For hearing of main case.

Mr. Muhammad Akhtar Shoro, Advocate for respondent No.7. Mr. Wali Muhammad Jamari, Assistant A.G.

None present for the applicant. Similar was the case on the last date of hearing viz. 14.12.2018, when the following order was passed:- “None is present for the applicant. There is also no intimation, although the name of learned counsel for the applicant has appeared in the daily cause list and today`s date is date by Court. As an indulgence and in the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned to 11.01.2019. In case none appears for the applicant and / or fails to proceed with the matter on the next date of hearing, an appropriate order would be passed.”

This revision application has been filed against the concurrent findings having narrow scope.

Be that as it may, since the matter on last date was adjourned by way of indulgence and it was held that if none appeared on behalf of the applicant on the next date of hearing, an appropriate order shall be passed. In the given

circumstances, the revision application is dismissed for non-prosecution alongwith pending application(s).

JUDGE

Tufail