Sindh High Court

Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Abdul Qayoom (Respondent)

Case
Const. P. 2097/2017
Type
Writ Jurisdictions
Judge
Mr. Justice Omar Sial
Length
1 page

Full judgment

Official copy

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH,

CIRCUIT COURT HYDERABAD

CP. No. S- 2079 of 2017

DATED ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

For orders on office objection For katcha peshi For hearing of MA 7783/17

Mr. Abdul Razzak Dasti, advocate for petitioner

Mr. Wali Muhammad Jamari, Asstt: A.G. along with SIP Muhammad Yaseen Brohi PS Matli for SHO Matli.

Learned counsel for petitioner states that he will be satisfied if learned A.A.G. gives undertaking that the official respondents shall act strictly in accordance with law.

Learned A.A.G. is present files comments on behalf of official respondents and states that the official respondents shall act strictly in accordance with law and shall provide the same protection to the petitioners as is available to other citizen of country.

Learned counsel for petitioner being satisfied with the undertaking does not press this petition any further which is accordingly disposed of as not pressed.

JUDGE

karar_hussain /PS*

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Please confirm