Sindh High Court
Muhammad Ashraf (Petitioner) VS Abdul Qayoom (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 2097/2017
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Omar Sial
- Length
- 1 page
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH,
CIRCUIT COURT HYDERABAD
CP. No. S- 2079 of 2017
DATED ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
For orders on office objection For katcha peshi For hearing of MA 7783/17
Mr. Abdul Razzak Dasti, advocate for petitioner
Mr. Wali Muhammad Jamari, Asstt: A.G. along with SIP Muhammad Yaseen Brohi PS Matli for SHO Matli.
Learned counsel for petitioner states that he will be satisfied if learned A.A.G. gives undertaking that the official respondents shall act strictly in accordance with law.
Learned A.A.G. is present files comments on behalf of official respondents and states that the official respondents shall act strictly in accordance with law and shall provide the same protection to the petitioners as is available to other citizen of country.
Learned counsel for petitioner being satisfied with the undertaking does not press this petition any further which is accordingly disposed of as not pressed.
JUDGE
karar_hussain /PS*
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 25 Jan 2018 Muhammad Arshad & others (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 30 Jan 2018 Mst. Qurban Khatoon (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 25 Jan 2018 Muhammad Umer (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 25 Jan 2018 Muhammad Amir (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 30 Jan 2018 Waseem Gul Shaikh (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)