Mst. Rukhsana & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT HYDERABAD

C.P.No.S-2190 of 2018.

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

1.For orders on office objection.

2.For hearing of main case.

Mr. Pervaiz Tarique Tagar, Advocate for petitioners, alongwith the petitioners.

Mr. Ali Abbas Memon, State Counsel.

Through this petition, it is submitted that the petitioner No.1 being sui juris having contracted marriage with petitioner No.2 on her own free will, antagonized the private respondents and on their behest, the official respondents are causing harassment to the petitioners, therefore, they are seeking protection from the official respondents.

Learned State Counsel submits that there is a matrimonial dispute between the parties and that the official respondents have nothing to do with the same. He further submits that neither the official respondents have harassed the petitioners nor they will do so.

Keeping in view the statement, made by learned State Counsel, counsel for the petitioners seeks disposal of the instant petition in terms thereof.

In view of the above, this petition having limited scope is being disposed of with direction to the respondents to not to cause any harassment to the petitioners with further direction to the official respondents to perform their functions and duties strictly in accordance with law without patronizing any group or individuals whether they are party in these proceedings or not. Official respondents / area police are further directed to provide legal protection to the petitioners in the event they approach them with such a request, however, strictly in accordance with law.

JUDGE

S