Sindh High Court
M/s Trump Management (Petitioner) VS Fasial Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 3539/2017
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyIN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
(Extraordinary Constitutional Jurisdiction)
Const. Petition No. D – 3539 of 2017
Date Order with signature of Judge
Present:
Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi Mr. Justice Arshad Hussain Khan.
Priority.
1.For hearing of Misc. No.9096/2019
2.For orders on Misc. No.16293/2017
3.For orders on Misc. No.16294/2017
4.For hearing of Main Case.
Mrs. Rehmat-un-Nisa, advocate for the petitioner Mr. Ashraf Ali Butt, advocate for the respondent.
ORDER
1.Both the learned counsel submit that the controversy agitated through instant petition, relating to the authority of the respondent/Cantonment Board Faisal to impose the Shop Board Fee/Tax in the absence of any valid Notification issued by the Federal Government, is illegal and without lawful authority, has already decided by a Divisional Bench of this Court vide order dated 04.12.2014 in the case of M/s. Pakistan State Oil Co. Ltd v.
Cantonment Board Faisal and others [C.P.No.D-126 of 2012] and several other petitions, as well as the order dated 13.05.2013 of the Hon’ble Supreme Court in the case of the Cantonment Board Clifton v. Excise Pakistan Ltd. & another [Civil Petition No. 76-K of 2012], in favour of the petitioner, therefore, request that instant petition may also be disposed of in the similar terms.
2.We have heard the learned counsel for the parties, perused the record with their assistance and also gone through the orders
passed by this Court as well as Hon’ble Supreme Court as referred to hereinabove. It will be advantageous to reproduce the relevant findings as contained in the order passed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court, as referred to hereinabove, which reads as follows:
“ After arguing the case at some length, both the learned counsel have jointly stated that Shop Board Fee in fact is a tax and respondents will pay the same according to the notification duly issued in compliance of Sections 60, 61 and 62 of the Cantonments Act, Accordingly, by consent, instant petition stands disposed of in the above terms alongwith listed applications.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Nadeem.
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2023 SHC KHI 38 · 14 Dec 2023 M/s Trump Management (Petitioner) VS Faisal Cantonment Board and Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2024 SBLR Sindh 1059 · 6 Jan 2024 M/s Millennium Mall Management Co (Petitioner) VS Pakistan and Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2023 SHC KHI 621 · 14 Dec 2023 Muhammad Ashraf Khan (Petitioner) VS Islamic Republic of Pakistan and Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2023 SHC KHI 1170 · 14 Dec 2023 Millennium Mall Management Co. (Petitioner) VS Fed. of Pakistan & Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2023 SHC KHI 1206 · 14 Dec 2023 M/S Maskatiya Industries (Pvt) Ltd (Petitioner) VS Federation of Pakistan & Others (Respondent)