Sindh High Court
Mst. Saima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 988/2016
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
- Length
- 1 page
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT
OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT,
HYDERABAD.
C. P. No. D — 2062 of 2016.
DATE ORDER
WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
FOR ORDERS ON OFFICE
OBJECTIONS.
FOR KATCHA PESHI.
Mr. M. Aslam Chandio, Advocate for petitioner.
Mr. Allah Bachayo Soomro, A.G.
Sindh along with SIP Manzoor Ali on behalf of SSP Hyderabad and ASI Imtiaz P.S. Qassimabad.
Through the instant Constitution Petition petitioner Syed Arif Hussain Shah has prayed for the following reliefs:-
a). That this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 and 3 to provide legal protection to the petitioner and his family members.
b). That this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 not to lodge any F.I.R. against the petitioner or his family members / relatives without prior permission of this Honourable Court.
c). That this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to make bound the private Respondents not to cause any kind of harassment to the petitioner in any manner whatsoever and do not resist in the peaceful construction of the petitioner.
Notices were issued against the Respondents as well as A.A.G. Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Shaikh, Advocate file Power on behalf of the Respondents No.6 to 8. Comments are also filed on behalf of the Respondents Nos.2,3 and 4.
Learned Advocate for petitioner submits that private Respondents are causing harassment to the petitioner by using the influence of police officials. Learned A.A.G. submits that no harassment whatsoever has been caused to the petitioner and action, if any, shall be taken strictly in accordance with law. Police officials SIP Manzoor Ali and ASI Imtiaz from Police Station Qassimabad, Hyderabad present in the Court states that neither they have harassed the petitioner nor petitioner shall be harassed in future.
In the view of above, counsel for petitioner express his satisfaction and doesn’t press the instant Constitution Petition more and it is accordingly 'disposed of'.
JUDGE
JUDGE
A.
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 30 Jul 2017 Javed (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 31 Jan 2017 Mst. Saima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 3243 · 3 Nov 2025 Mst. Waheeda Begum (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 3217 · 29 Sep 2025 Muhammad Junaid s/o Muhammad Bachal (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 23 Jan 2018 Mst. Azeema (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)