Sindh High Court

Mst. Saima (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh and others (Respondent)

Case
Const. P. 988/2016
Type
Writ Jurisdictions
Bench
Mr. Justice Naimatullah Phulpoto, Mr. Justice Rasheed Ahmed Soomro
Length
1 page

Full judgment

Official copy

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT

OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT,

HYDERABAD.

C. P. No. D — 2062 of 2016.

DATE ORDER

WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE

FOR ORDERS ON OFFICE

OBJECTIONS.

FOR KATCHA PESHI.

Mr. M. Aslam Chandio, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Allah Bachayo Soomro, A.G.

Sindh along with SIP Manzoor Ali on behalf of SSP Hyderabad and ASI Imtiaz P.S. Qassimabad.

Through the instant Constitution Petition petitioner Syed Arif Hussain Shah has prayed for the following reliefs:-

a). That this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.2 and 3 to provide legal protection to the petitioner and his family members.

b). That this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct the Respondent No.3 not to lodge any F.I.R. against the petitioner or his family members / relatives without prior permission of this Honourable Court.

c). That this Honourable Court may be pleased to direct the respondent No.2 to 4 to make bound the private Respondents not to cause any kind of harassment to the petitioner in any manner whatsoever and do not resist in the peaceful construction of the petitioner.

Notices were issued against the Respondents as well as A.A.G. Mr. Shakeel Ahmed Shaikh, Advocate file Power on behalf of the Respondents No.6 to 8. Comments are also filed on behalf of the Respondents Nos.2,3 and 4.

Learned Advocate for petitioner submits that private Respondents are causing harassment to the petitioner by using the influence of police officials. Learned A.A.G. submits that no harassment whatsoever has been caused to the petitioner and action, if any, shall be taken strictly in accordance with law. Police officials SIP Manzoor Ali and ASI Imtiaz from Police Station Qassimabad, Hyderabad present in the Court states that neither they have harassed the petitioner nor petitioner shall be harassed in future.

In the view of above, counsel for petitioner express his satisfaction and doesn’t press the instant Constitution Petition more and it is accordingly 'disposed of'.

JUDGE

JUDGE

A.

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Please confirm