Sindh High Court
Muhammad Ismail (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Bail 1058/2019
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD
Cr.B.A.No.S-1058 of 2019
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
1.For orders on office objection
2.For hearing of main case.
Mr. Waqar Ali G. Zaur, advocate along with applicant.
Ms. Rameshan Oad, A.P.G for the State.
Irshad Ali Shah J;- It is alleged that the applicant was found selling gutka / mainpuri an injurious / poisonous substance intending to spread infections / disease likely to be dangerous / poisonous to human lives, for that he was booked and reported upon by the police.
2.The applicant on having been refused pre-arrest bail by learned Ist Additional Sessions Judge, Tharparkar at Mithi has sought for the same from this Court by way of instant application under Section 498 Cr.P.C.
3.It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant being innocent has been involved in this case falsely by the police without any lawful justification and malafide. By contending so, he sought for pre-arrest bail for the applicant on point of further enquiry and malafide.
4.Learned A.P.G. for the State has opposed to grant of pre arrest bail to the applicant by contending that the offence which he has committed is affecting the society at large.
5.I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
6.All the penal sections applied in case are bailable, except one under section 337-J PPC, which entails imprisonment up-to 10 years in addition to Arsh / Daman. There is no independent witness to the incident. Negligible quantity of contraband substance has been subjected to chemical examination that too with delay of about seven days. The case has finally been challaned and there is no apprehension of tempering with the evidence on the part of applicant as all the witnesses are police personals. In these circumstances, a case for grant of bail to the applicant on point of further enquiry and malafide is obviously made out.
7.In view of above, the interim pre-arrest bail already granted to the applicant is confirmed on same terms and conditions.
8.The instant bail application is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 13 Dec 2019 TARIQUE ALI KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 13 Dec 2019 Asif dildar Haider (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 13 Dec 2019 Anwar (Applicant) VS THe State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 22 Nov 2019 Moinuddin (Applicant) VS The State and another (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 20 Dec 2019 FAQEER MUHAMMAD (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)