M/s.Abid S. Zuberi & others (Applicant) VS M/s.Kh.Shamsul Islam and another (Respondent)

ORDER SHEET

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Crl. Misc. Application No.79 of 2014

DATE

ORDER

WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE(S)

For Katcha Peshi.

For orders on M.A. No.2249/2014

For orders on M.A. No.2250/2014

For orders on M.A. No.2251/2014

For orders on M.A. No.2252/2014

For orders on M.A. No.2253/2014

(Objection/Parawise Reply filed as at Flagged)

(Statement dated 23.05.2014 A/W annexures filed at flagged)

(Attention is respectfully invited to the office note dated 09.04.2014) Mr. Abdul Hafeez Lakho, Advocate for the complainant.

Mr.

Mohamed Vawda, Advocate holding brief for Mr.Faisal Siddiqi, Advocate for complainant Mr. Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry, Advocate.

Mr.

Abdur Rehman, Advocate for Muhammad Haseeb Jamali, Advocate.

Mr.

Amanullah Khan, Advocate for Mr. Muhammad Anwar Tariq, Advocate.

Respondent M/s Khawaja Shamsul Islam and Khawaja Saiful Islam, Advocates are present in person.

M/r Saifullah and Sibtain Mehmood along with Ms. Nasreen Sehto.

For the reasons to be recorded later on, instant Crl. Misc. Application is disposed of in view of paragraph 3 of the reply to Show Cause Notices submitted by the alleged contemnors, who have thrown themselves at the mercy of the Court and have tendered unconditional apology, which is accepted subject to conditions which may be imposed while recording reasons, and consequently, the Show Cause Notice (s) issued to them stand discharged.

The request of the complainants to send the matter to the Pakistan Bar Counsel, and for taking action in terms of Section 54 read with Section 41 of the Legal Practitioners and Bar Council Act, 1973, in view of acceptance of unconditional apology and discharge of Show Cause Notice(s) by this Court, is declined. However, it will not prejudice the right of the complainant(s) to approach the Pakistan Bar Council to initiate appropriate proceedings in accordance with law against the alleged contemnors in the instant case, which, if so instituted, may be decided in accordance with law and on the basis of material and the evidence which may be adduced, without being influenced with these proceedings for observation which may reflect in the detailed reasons to be recorded by this Court.

JUDGE

JUDGE JUDGE

JUDGE JUDGE

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

C.P. No. D-22 of 2016.

DATE

ORDER

WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE.

Hearing/Priority case.

1.For orders on Office Objeciton.

For hearing of Misc No. 94/2016.

3.For hearing of main case.

Malik Altaf Javed, Advocate for petitioner.

Mr. Saleem Akhtar, A.P.G.

With the consent of the learned counsel for the parties, instant petition is disposed of in the following terms:- Petitioner Abdul Wahab son of Abdul Rahim is granted protective bail for the period of 10 (Ten) days from today in Crime No. 305/2013 of PS Feroze Abad District East Karachi and Crime No.272/2012 of PS SITE B Karachi, in order to enable him to surrender before the concerned court provided he furnishes two solvent sureties in the sum of Rs.200,000/-(Rupees Two Lacs) and P.R. bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Nazir of this Court.

This order shall cease to have effect on 31.01.2016 or upon surrender of petitioner before the concerned Court, whichever is earlier. In the meantime operation of the red-warrants shall remain suspended.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Gohar PS

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH

COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Cr. Acquittal Appeal No.D-335 of 2012

DATE

ORDER

WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE.

Priority case

1.For orders on Office Objection & reply of Adv: at flag-A.

2 For orders on CMA No.8844/2012

3.For hearing of case.

Ms. Shahida Jatoi, Advocate for Appellant/ANF.

Mr. Jamal Ahmed S. Mufti, Advocate for respondent.

SIP, Attaullah Khan Jadoon, PS ANF Clifton Karachi has placed on record un-served notice stating therein that due to incomplete address, notice could not be served on Respondent No.2. Appellant’s counsel to ensure that complete address is provided to the office so that fresh notice be issued against the respondent.

Let needful be done within ten days.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Gohar

PS