Sindh High Court
Ghulam Mohammad and others (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Rev 66/2014
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Muhammad Iqbal Mahar, Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.
Cr. Rev. A. No.D- 66 of 2014
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
1.For orders on MA-7651/14
2.For hearing of main case.
3.For hearing of MA-1280/15
Mr. Waqar Ahmed Memon, Advocate for applicant.
Mr. Ghulam Sarwar Qureshi, advocate for respondent No.1 Mr. Muhammad Ismail Bhutto, Additional Advocate General.
It is alleged that the applicant was found to be in possession of 10 liter of Katcha wine and consequent upon investigation he was booked and challaned to face trial for offence punishable under Article 3/4 of Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order,1979, by the Excise Police at Umerkot.
2.On conclusion of the trial, the applicant was found guilty for an offence punishable under Article 4 of Prohibition (Enforcement of Hadd) Order,1979 and was convicted and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for one year with benefit of section 382-B Cr.P.C by learned Ist Civil Judge and Judicial Magistrate, Umerkot vide his judgment dated
3.The appeal so preferred by the applicant against his conviction was dismissed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Umerkot vide his judgment dated 15.09.2010. Such dismissal of his appeal, the applicant has impugned before this Court by way of instant Criminal Revision Application.
4.At the very outset, it is stated by learned APG for the State that entire revisional jurisdiction in Hadd / Hudood case as per mandate contained by Article 203DD (1) of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan, 1973 lies with the Hon’ble Federal Shairiat Court of Pakistan. By stating so she sought for dismissal of instant Revision Application for want of jurisdiction.
5.Learned counsel for the applicant when was confronted with the above legal position, was fair enough to concede that the entire revisional jurisdiction in Hadd / Hudood case lies with the Hon’ble Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan. By conceding so, he sought for direction against the office of this Court to transmit the record of instant Criminal Revision Application to Hon’ble Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan for its disposal on merits and in accordance with law as per the mandate contained by Articled 10A of the Constitution of Islamic Republic of Pakistan 1973, which according to him provide right of fair trial to the applicant for determination of his Civil/Criminal obligations/charges.
6.In view of above, office of this Court is directed to transmit the record of instant Criminal Revision Application to Hon’ble Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan for its disposal in accordance with law or otherwise as deemed fit by the Hon’ble Federal Shariat Court of Pakistan.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 18 Sep 2019 Abdul Khaliq Bhatti (Applicant) VS Muhammad Hussain and Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 23 Aug 2019 Shoukat (Applicant) VS THE State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 873 · 8 Mar 2021 Mehboob Alam (Applicant) VS The State and another (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 4 Jan 2013 Imdad Hussain Tunio (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 328 · 26 Oct 2020 Kanwer Muhammad Hussain (Applicant) VS I.G Police & Ors (Respondent)