Lahore High Court
Mst. Sardaran VS DJ etc
- Case
- 20138-04
- Type
- WP- Guardian & Wards Act
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Mirza Viqas Rauf
- Length
- 7 pages
Full judgment
Official copyr- rl Fi fr il ]ELUE ST,NP rr rh//- /t (R'evised: under Act No. II of I 990) n ll,J)L-l/\-'-ll n fi
I
E ORill)0R ()F lf]l{E C0{JRlf' fl
n llrn th,e Courti/lf nihunn[:
tl ff fr :l g;^t$ t{*, ' N,-',) " t 3 r\/iloo // 17 '-y 1,lu Y.r.
E
Deciclleall *w lQ --'//'- )t/L' il Vcs/$lo.
(u)"nudgm,emt appnoved fon neportfrmg h itd
(h)lltcgistnan should see witku ne{'encmce to the worle Yes/Flo" on comdluct of'some iudicial oilficen' # (c ) [fso, a sepanate comfTdemtial mo0e slnould ' YeslNo. ifr he semt to hinm im questiom"
It iu CMR.T'NEIAAT& Ceirtifiecl tllnat ttlhe .fludgrment/onden is hased upon or gnnumcietes tr rl pninciple o{' law/Oecldes a question of law . which is of fisrst impncssiom/discimguishcs/ovan-nolnesh'everses/expnaims a pnev{otls i$ r."l dlocisrlom" iil
iil --7vvr'/ .nudge(s)iFnesidimg O1[ficen
it Stnikc out wnricheven is not appnicahlle' ill ill iiIl Flo{c:- (n) T'Iais slip is omny (o he used when somc actiom is 0o be takem
fli
(2)nf thc snip is used, the Readcn maust attacla it to ttre {op ofthe il first page o{'the judgmemt.
il (3) Readen mlust ask. tlae Jtudge wnitireg rthe "Iuatrgmern{ whether ttne f'l .nudgmemt is appnovcd for renrontimg'
[1 Those qnireations which ana naot to he used should he rleletecl' ll ['r Il Jrrdgment iJpload on Website n ll i llntry in Databasc n
l.
',t r--- O - . -" .,r'tfiA4 ov'21'* ts patition No'21' ..^^-_,, H( rtrA 18,
,'iiil:11,1':'-;, r F.r LAHoRb rN r H tr iJIs'? ffiJJ?h'iuKun' of 2004 No"20138 Writ Petition
through L'Rs''' "' " "''Petrtioners (deceased) N4st' Satdaran
V3'
' .....Respondents
and others" Judge" Mianwali District
}UDGWIENT
19.11'20\4 :". (harBatouch, t..-"- Date o[hearing: Htlssatrr Mr.lmtiaz Petrtroner bY: Aclvocate' ,,,-^11rliazi, Kna Nawaz bY: Mr'Qaisar ResPondentNs'3 ,Aclvocate'
**'--*#,:*i[:'il,iffi .
iffil :::r"IT:**k,,r*:, ;il:::,";":: ::: " 2,,. 'il;;;;,:':,;"::fi:ll 1,",.' Ac'|' t8e0 ".*11''* ,r.", *,:
TH:-:::1il:i:* h;.':":;ffi**, clairntng "'l..ourun tsibi was *":t:':'r:, Sirni\arly' Mianwali, ":::::I:.i- 15:"1il:.:l';
iather.
T::,',:fi';li:i:"^
\ o of 2$44 petirion No"20138 of 'rhe minor.,"^T-:,: _. , _. -.iirlon for custocry *"'.ll':
rcsp, nr,cn,
Msr. Gurriva u"t"o",;:; [: :;:i;:j::-fi,;:',nT:ir], *ol",llt.n* ::
Z,aman lvrst. \Jrurrlva Muna"""- Mrs Muham^, the r'rnor rsainrr agarnst Mls ^r rnor,, or roor,. .t:t"l:-::';t".""";;; c'lailrrirrg i,L^n Tlesponden] Respondenr w'l''No'626 /t. way oI .I,.,n*.,.d , *,, Mr.rrramtnud, ,ui.r perilions by
.'n'"1'lo,jl,,riuns (daughter wellas :::il:;;;
t^'],I]" .,rhrrcin asierl,ons No-3 us rhe saici,1'c ,.r,e: of (espectlve)'''."*r" filing their vider orcler in iho perilloj;:"* ""nor*:n"_tn.,,*r" consolidared conrained ,^,* o*1t*t,,:: ano the *.'.\]^tn: '';. Judge, Mianwau l. t.urn.a 'iuardiar tlaieti i8.0e'2003 "'J;".r*-,.t:"'".::;.arc G*rria and consolrd'att'.''r.l** wel t oi mrnors lililowing
1.1n "ur,"dy Pa(tles' Surr-rera Bibl lies'?0P tlrerr adducerl z. I{elief. ^ r-,nih rhe par'rics lui. .^..,":'::''i::':"l.;: ffi ;:'m:i:il:
:: ;.:t" -*^*'"-' :::"I:# ;, .:l;l"l,lu"''1"" "''"'u "'l :1: :::::
ccr-tillt"::,:,.,;., schoo\ hcr appearcd .' *.-i;]"' *^l t:::.::
;-i:-:: ',1"''.-""""'o oor'plcrion 'rr Ahrer -" evide'ce fned br
5.;;;;",., :':]":". peririoner Judgc accept'i::: f,rlcd o1 '1r",, icarncd Guardiun i;- t.,ition "'uo* a., M/s as^]nn""t"a *:_:,i":r.a.l; n.ro""ner. *rit i.e. respon<re't
'lT. ^,.
::"" i;l
:::. r J";:: *,T t'"':,''.'-* ;:Tfl "'::: tiro scP.afate::1"-,;. oouf ttn'n"d prelerred rrrercol petrtion) .Iu"',.e Guardiarr -o]" o::
the rearned 'i-,:-,*:"*rt**-o Addi. Dislrit a^'"a2fiY2oorl'the T;::::,.il:ff"-"'
'' "hNsbeen '. *-tr'l {Ol15 I'- !\ttlL 'fhe tl'st't"'. 'nr, 'rli itXitt Yv"-' ,r- rlrr buth the . u,.""'
.r:---i..sed both the appeals' purr"d by rdgc itrdgtrte'
*" t"" rrro sai.l oonsoli,Jated tl$ittt-lst
4E
rc[crlcd rel-ef{eo _ _ r - tho r f^r rlrc petilioiler) netitioners o"'o*;"'-:,:::, Jun' the ti:l *t"":tJ;;rat ffi :X*'-:ilH::
uilan u:.,"n_ .uu*i* that bcforc *' imrnec|iatery .rrer uon, tiom l,o" arongwith r o mrnor u'nt-:;: ;';", ::']"::;. "r.;", n^rtun',,nl.t*^_,. Mst. Nazirarr pare,rrb B'rbi. rnrrrors *,' *httt"'1 naz';;, ul'Mst Naziran dcath. she dear,r
a"ugr,r",,
rr"'on"illl.|"[,:*,:-il "o*, ;- :'":::::,"lll:*","runa*ort'r.r.
in custodv rcnr'rln f u,",.roonocnt No"t adds tna' i::il;;",n.:^on T:fi: lle furtrrcr "rn.l:ri:r,ion tt"t"'.;;;*r, "rr*0, of evidence.
SumairaBibr Pjurj place-.clurrng ""u"ni otro raken ';:.::", ::T:l'':;'";;' 1""'1":':: l; ;"# ;"'*'nona"1; \;H
1; ?;-i.I ":i:*i'i J:'^',] ;:;,;", :' t'""";"";"rt,". co'rracted 1i ::H, ll:
or '"tn:X::
u'*'l'.:::-"t *", *r, SarrJla' rnairrtairts tu"t.'*'':t:,;;;iso dicd .":t;j;;:., period' t"""'*1, .in thc instanr -:::.::;
rrcirs we111adan Law
:::il"J;"" Learned cotrtrsel t*-t' ":T:. havc been i:;;'tr close t"tf i"llr*., .r,n" petrrroners.
o11''i, "oN"N r *":]:;r'"".0,p"*co*r* in surpporr
l' """::"i1,::il::.
rcported as ffia,gryLila'qlJLY""'- *e!'-!azlr tsB'' ' ', \ (1988 SCMR ,-*no 1052). 1052)' -^^At, and olhersl' l, ,r**t SCNIR 1,.,o in hef Parents Conversely' inors was residtng 1. rnorirer ol t**/Jfo 1n", *"' -t'"";t;t
',rrrot o"gol-/N!
^nn,t *' '. ^ hrtrNev9f ' ,u o1.flr1w.rth rhe fllinors' ::lJ.;
il^l***{*#*'ffii;} :l*::;:ff:'.h;., ::l::":T ;{i: *':'[*: :"{ti,ii *;:":::: *ry*i,g ffi:-I.' ilI "lj::;";," io*, 202, 1*::':ffi** *;;:.1 ","::,:,i;t"-*^-#-, Irc'-- , t othe!). l- \o MLD .,. thelL' ^q /'1 i.* and after DJLt(heL-4t\i1;,,, e Parties
DW
t:- '*o.,u.", 4y#K;**",.T:,['::ff *"::_.";; rt. ;f:::, *"::_'*..r i, :f r\a'ins observcd rather or \.re or thc reco1.f. rhar tcsPondell,"ll. o*,n"rniore "' *1:;.;-,,."-i,:::^* ."",,",'*o . Jl.*,' ""1 il: "T:i] *"..:::;,,:l:";;,.,.,, "1"_, "'u*n "ll: *" ,,0", ,t.i::^::::,ul*" ""u '-i:J:
minors.
"tt:
:":T::"#,;rhc l":;-rarher ffi -*'. '"" -l:::*" * school where or": minors::fi :l]-i, jx; ::l' ff :";l::ll ll;:ruxT,J :
j':]il:
rl*# ulud v in* "::
::: ;'.n*':j*''*;""'
alarlab\e t l,':";- " ^1"'"'l* or \earned ".0. *l^lj" vesrs *:"";;:;;
wrth,espondentNo'r' ni* :1r]],lJi.nuon *]l,:", *t*::.:, u,o,,"*",*i "' ,,* ",'**"t"
*"t*-"0"- :"^:
rhe in$arrl 1:':"":,u";-, ,"*,r*- ';i:':::^:;:J La'rv *o'*.":":';.
co,,nse\ ,",0 o.:u,;.:::il J,;;. Muharnrtradan *:l':' *iJ;;;ch "il;:,:l;* *det o reads asas'r*det
ff:;"
" oo{7t'04 o* No 2('|13'\ -'r retationsfl*-l:$:i:ilqfl lTJ,T"$iriTiil"'.t'}*- -be\oneb'- f':"!f"il, tlf;" siven'''" *d., sio** ;tJi"i}:t i.*, lfl.";der hi\ rer ;
Tii- iliiltTut", nu\ s ran'.
'lli,',{i:ilfil,,o;:,0""
h $,t:*$i,*li'*:;;ft r";r;
'li, f:,\l{,''l#l'lli\:.il'J ;i.:,';i;.,,,",.* appoin'I a :."r,,.
\cans in'l'":"
ffi,T::J:":"tr*ll'o'"^,'' rhe above,-,lJ:;;:f- 'Ihc abo'v'-,t.,. t:"::.", i,,dgn'"'.'..
il:"filt* :":.4 repor{ed,",u-1 qross '",,0. r,,H", so^I;,":;: in the .."^"0 *" conccll'l ilL]e )l^iij'r*uu4*- *t .rrerenr eLlr"' different as
o*t,,ol'I.^*,"),"ir,rt:t.li*?,i1"^,.,,*.'"":].':,*;'lu*oavtott'" ffi ln,n^
ff T:: -ii*.:i
-'T:; ;::Ti5H:;:;f:"
::T::I::: :il f . i
",; -:,": ;- :*' "n n*,,,i3;,t*;;" $:.. _ .::. ":",;"'.,:',l-:i ;;;:;r:." ":::,1.
T:,:T::fi:":l;#--:
rlith re€
W*ri.,n. The iacls 1' the :*,. T::[J::, ffi #:*-," ;,,','.ru,#-*** :
petrrru"l^,o rrstdllt Y-.^1. douo* it-, iudgrnen - r ( ha(t_
I
instan[ the PtrnctP'- . .l.tt) \arc\ donr f.',,^.iIL-(
v tts.-)!98-
i i
o l3E2) wherein the Hon'ble Apex court in similar cirsumstances, laid ) rlown in Para-4 at Fage-1384, the followir-lg principle:- 'ol\odoubt,thattherninonhasbcemlivingwiththepetitioner ever since her trirth but stre is an old lady with weak eye-sight andhartlofxrearing.[tisonrecordthattherninor'sarrnwas fractuned auld due to caretress treatment, her arrn has not been fully recovered. It is also adrnitted by the petitioner in her statement that a school and a mosque are adjacent to her housebu{thenrrinorwasneithenadrnitteci.intheschoo|nor any arrangeinxent was rnade for hen neligious studies' She a|soadmittedfhatneithensfienorlrerhusbandhaslearntthe flo|y Qur'an" ,{s agairasf it, the respoltdent's case is tha-t he andhisparemtwhoownsnilficiemt|andcantalrecareofthe rninor im rnore appropriate nnanmer thaf the petitioner being niatural guandian""
10.In view of the above cliscussion, tliis Court is of the view that allcJ after both the oourts below l-lave very ably appreciated the evidence findings' due appreciation, reached at their conclusion' The concurrent calling for in my l-rumble view, dicl not sllffer any iliegatity or perversity' jurisdiction' It is any interference by this Court while exercising the writ to challenge an further held that collstitutional petition cannot be resorted order on the grouncl that evidence was not properly appreciatecl as jurisdiction findings of, the lacts recorded by the Court of competent cannot be disturbed soleiy on the ground that another view could be
possible on the sartle evidence' The }ligh Court in its constiiutiorral
juriscliction cannot sit as a Court of Appeal' Even otherwise' in the r't'ake
down in of lresh developllents, in terms of facts as well as law laid Para 355 of the Muhammadan Law, the f'ather being natural guardian has
preferential right of custociy of the rrinors' This being so' the instant
petition fails and is dismissed with r-io order as to costs' t , ''''7zl'ml''
(MIR.ZA VIQAS RAUF)
J1JDGtr ,4pproved fon RePontft ng
/v4f
JUDGE
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 1405 · 8 Oct 2019 AHMED RAZA @ MUSHKI S/O ABDUL REHMAN (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 1473 · 10 Mar 2022 ALI HASSAN MAGSI @ AKBAR S/O RAHEEM BUX & ANOTHER (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 1401 · 27 Aug 2019 SYED RIFFAT HUSSAIN S/O SYED SHAKIR ABBASS & ANTHR (Appellant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Peshawar High Court · 2018 YLR 2663 · 24 May 2017 Shah Hussain VS Mst. Nadia
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 1399 · 13 Sep 2019 Iftikhar Ahmed @ Imtiaz (Appellant) VS The State (Respondent)