Sindh High Court
Ghulam Akbar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Bail 899/2020
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT,
HYDERABAD
Criminal Bail Application No.S-899 of 2020
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
For orders on office objection.
For hearing of main case.
Mr. Altaf Hussain Chandio, Advocate for applicant. Ms. Sobia Bhatti, A.P.G for the State.
Mr. Abdul Rahim Gajo, Advocate for complainant.
ORDER
Irshad Ali Shah J:- It is alleged that the applicant with rest of the culprit in furtherance of their common intention not only committed Qatl-i-amd of Mst. Shamim Akhtar and Suhail Aitbar by causing them fire shot injuries but caused fire shot injuries to PW Sufiyan Ali with intention to commit his murder, for that present case was registered.
2.The applicant on having been refused post arrest bail by learned 3rd Additional Sessions Judge, Shaheed Benazirabad has sought for the same from this court by way of making instant application under section 497 Cr.P.C.
3.It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant being innocent has been involved in this case falsely by the complainant party in order to satisfy its enmity with him over landed property and the role attributed to the applicant in commission of incident is only to the extent of instigation. In support of his
contention he relied upon case of Wazir Muhammad vs the State
(1978 SCMR 448).
4.Learned A.P.G for the State and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed to grant of bail to the applicant by contending that he has actively participated in commission of incident.
5.I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
6.The role attributed to the applicant in commission of incident is only to the instigation therefore, his involvement in commission of incident obviously is calling for further enquiry.
7.In view of above, the applicant is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing surety in sum of Rs.200,000/- and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial court.
8.The instant bail application is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa,
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 923 · 4 Feb 2021 AFAQUE ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 575 · 7 Dec 2020 SIKANDAR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 87 · 9 Mar 2021 MUSHIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 29 · 14 Dec 2020 Sadique Kapri (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 47 · 9 Mar 2021 GHULAM NABI @ GHULAM MUSTAFA @ GHULAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)