Sindh High Court
GHULAM NABI @ GHULAM MUSTAFA @ GHULAM (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Bail 979/2020
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Summary from the court's website
The name and description of the applicant are not appearing in the FIR; his involvement on the basis of recovery of pistol and 161 Cr.P.C statements of the PWs Peroz Khan and Irshad Ali, which have been recorded with delay of about [12] days to FIR is calling for further inquiry.
Full judgment
Official copyIN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD
Criminal Bail Application No.S-979 of 2020
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
Mr. Abdul Rasool Abbasi, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. Ayaz Khaskheli, advocate for complainant. Ms. Sobia Bhatti, A.P.G for the State.
ORDER
Irshad Ali Shah J:- It is alleged that the applicant with the rest of the culprits after having formed an unlawful assembly and in prosecution of their common object committed murder of Farooque Ali by causing him fire shot injuries, for that the present case was registered.
2.The applicant on having been refused post arrest bail by learned Additional Sessions Judge-I, Dadu has sought for the same from this court by making separate bail applications u/s 497 Cr.P.C.
3.It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant being innocent has been involved in this case falsely by the complainant in order to satisfy its matrimonial dispute with him; the name and description of the applicant is not appearing in FIR though it is lodged with delay of about [13] hours; therefore, his involvement on the basis of recovery of pistol is requiring further inquiry. By contending so, he sought for release of the applicant on bail.
4.Learned A.P.G for the State and learned counsel for the complainant have opposed to release of the applicant on bail by contending that he has actively participated in commission of incident by causing fire shot injuries to the deceased.
5.I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
6.The name and description of the applicant are not appearing in the FIR; his involvement on the basis of recovery of pistol and 161 Cr.P.C statements of the PWs Peroz Khan and Irshad Ali, which have been recorded with delay of about [12] days to FIR is calling for further inquiry.
7.In view of above, the applicant is admitted to bail subject to his furnishing surety in the sum of Rs.200,000/- and PR bond in the like amount to the satisfaction of learned trial Court.
8.The instant bail application is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa,
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 277 · 22 Dec 2020 GHULAM QADIR @ QADIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 923 · 4 Feb 2021 AFAQUE ALI (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1063 · 9 Mar 2021 GHULAM MUSTAFA (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 87 · 9 Mar 2021 MUSHIR (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1242 · 7 Dec 2020 Ghulam Akbar (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)