Sindh High Court
Mst. Humera and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 89/2020
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
- Length
- 1 page
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH
CIRCUIT COURT HYDERABAD
C.P No.S-89 of 2020 For orders on office objection.
For orders on MA No.293/2020.
For hearing of main case.
Petitioners: Mst. Humera and another through Mr. Mujeebur Rehman Pathan, Advocate.
Respondents No.1to5: Province of Sindh & others through Mr. Allah Bachayo Soomro, Additional Advocate General Sindh along with SIP Hadi Bux Khaskheli PS Kot Ghulam Muhammad, District Mirpurkhas.
Respondents No.6to9: None present.
Date of hearing: 10.08.2020.
Date of order: 10.08.2020.
ORDER
ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J. - Through this petition, the petitioners have prayed for protection as provided under the law.
Learned counsel for the petitioners states at the bar that the petitioner No.1 has contracted freewill marriage with petitioner No.2 out of her own accord without any pressure, coercion or compulsion but this un-ceremonial marriage has annoyed the relatives of petitioner No.1, who are causing harassment to the petitioners through the official respondents. Petitioner No.1 is present in person and states that she has contracted marriage with petitioner No.2 namely Niaz Ahmed son of Hazoor Bux. She further states that due to aforesaid un-ceremonial marriage, her relatives, being annoyed, misled the official respondents regarding her so-called abduction by the petitioner No.2.
In pursuance of Court notice dated 02.03.2020, the comments filed by the official respondent No.2,3,4 and 5, taken on record, copies whereof provided to the learned counsel for the petitioners. Petitioner Mst. Humera present in Court reiterates her earlier stance and categorically submits that she has contracted valid marriage with petitioner No.2 out of her own freewill and consent.
Learned A.A.G. Sindh states that due protection would be provided to the petitioners strictly in accordance with law. Let the needful be done accordingly.
In view of whatever mentioned above, the instant petition stands disposed of along with pending applications.
JUDGE
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 294 · 10 Aug 2020 Mst. Aqeela and another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 733 · 10 Aug 2020 Mst. Shahnaz & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1327 · 5 Oct 2020 Mst. Majdan & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 2091 · 7 Sep 2020 Mst. Saima & another (Petitioner) VS Province Of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 14 Feb 2019 Mst. Rukhsana & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)