Sindh High Court
HAFIZ JAWAD AHMED (Applicant) VS MST.SHABANA & OTHERS (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Misc. 112/2021
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Summary from the court's website
Learned trial Magistrate by way of impugned order has taken the cognizance of the incident on police report, such order could not be said to be illegal only for the reason that it has been passed against the applicant. If, the applicant is having a feeling that he is innocent then he may prove his innocence by joining the trial. No case for indulgence by this Court in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is made out.
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.
Cr. Misc. Appln. No.S- 112 of 2021
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
1.For orders on MA-1711/2021
2.For orders on office objection
3.For orders on MA-1712/2021
4.For hearing of main case.
5.For orders on MA-1713
Mr. Ali Asghar Mangi, advocate for applicant.
1.Urgency granted.
2to5. The applicant is alleged to have committed rape with Mst.Saba and was booked accordingly. On completion of the investigation, challan u/s 173 Cr.P.C was submitted by the police, the cognizance whereof was taken by learned trial Magistrate vide his order dated 11.02.2021, which is impugned by the applicant before this Court by way of instant Criminal Misc. Application.
It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant being innocent has been involved in this case falsely by the complainant party; DNA report was negative, therefore, learned trial Magistrate ought not to have taken the cognizance of the incident.
I have considered the above argument and perused the record.
Learned trial Magistrate by way of impugned order has taken the cognizance of the incident on police report, such order could not be said to be illegal only for the reason that it has been passed against the applicant. If, the applicant is having a feeling that he is innocent then he may prove his innocence by joining the trial. No case for indulgence
by this Court in exercise of its inherent jurisdiction is made out.
Consequently, the instant Criminal Misc. Application being misconceived is dismissed in limini.
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1247 · 18 Jan 2021 Hafiz Jawad Ahmed (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1004 · 1 Mar 2021 ALTAF HUSSAIN (Applicant) VS FAIMLY JUDGE & J.M S.B.A & OTHERS (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 546 · 13 Jan 2021 MEER KALHORO (Applicant) VS J.M II SEHWAN & OTHERS (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 255 · 13 Jan 2021 MUHAMMAD NAWAZ & ANOTHER (Applicant) VS SADDAM HUSSAIN & OTHERS (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 347 · 23 Oct 2020 MST.NAZEERAN (Applicant) VS I.O P.S JAMSHORO & OTHERS (Respondent)