Sindh High Court
IZZAT GUL (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Case
- Cr.Rev 8/2021
- Type
- Criminal Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Mr. Justice Irshad Ali Shah
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, CIRCUIT COURT, HYDERABAD.
Criminal Revision Application No. S-08 of 2021
DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURE OF JUDGE
For orders on office objections For hearing of main case
Mr. Faisal Ali Raza Bhatti, advocate for applicant.
Mr. Shawak Rathor, D.P.G for State.
The facts in brief necessary for disposal of instant Revision Application are that the truck owned by the applicant was used for transporting Gutka and Mainpuri, for that a case was registered by the police. The applicant sought for its custody on Superdari by making an application u/s 516-A Cr.P.C, it was dismissed by learned IInd Additional Sessions Judge, Badin vide his order dated 13.01.2021, which is impugned by the applicant before this Court by way of instant Criminal Revision Application.
2.It is contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is lawful owner of subject truck, if its custody on Superdari is not allowed in his favour, then it would lost its use and utility. By contending so, he sought for setting aside of impugned order with direction to learned trial Court to
restore the subject truck in favour of the applicant on Superdari.
3.Learned D.P.G for the State has sought for dismissal of instant Criminal Revision application by contending that it has been used in commission of incident.
4.I have considered the above arguments and perused the record.
5.Admittedly, the applicant is lawful owner of the subject truck; therefore, he could not be denied its use and utility under any circumstances, most particularly when investigation of the case in which it is involved is over. In these circumstances, the impugned order is set-aside with direction to learned trial Court to restore the custody of subject truck in favour of applicant on Superdari subject to his furnishing security in sum of rupees one lac and PR bond in the like amount to its satisfaction.
6.The instant Revision Application is disposed of accordingly.
JUDGE
Ahmed/Pa,
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 1245 · 25 Feb 2021 Muhammad Moosa (Applicant) VS The State & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 2133 · 17 Aug 2020 SHAHEEDAR KHAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 119 · 8 Mar 2021 MUHAMMAD NOMAN (Applicant) VS THE STATE (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 20 Apr 2018 Khalid Mehmood (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC HYD 5 · 27 Jan 2021 Najubullah (Applicant) VS The State (Respondent)