Sindh High Court
Shaikh Waseem Ahmed & Another (Appellant) VS Pir Muhammad Qasim Quraishi & Others (Respondent)
- Case
- H.C.A 168/2021
- Type
- Civil Appellate Jurisdictions
- Judge
- Chief Justice Mr. Justice Aqeel Ahmed Abbasi
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH, KARACHI
High Court Appeal No.168 of 2021
Date Order with signature of Judges
Fresh Case.
1.For orders on office objection a/w reply as at ‘A’.
2.For orders on C.M.A. No.1776/2021 (Exemp. App.)
3.For hearing of main case.
4.For orders on C.M.A. No.1777/2021 (Stay)
Mr. Obaid-ur-Rehman Khan, advocate for the appellants.
1.To be complied with before the next date of hearing.
2.Granted subject to all just exceptions.
3-4. Learned counsel for the appellants after arguing the matter at some length while confronted to point out any error or perversity in the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge in Suit Nos.1976 of 2021 & 643 of 2021 during the course of hearing. As prima-facie, the impugned order does not give rise any cause of action to be agitated by filing instant High Court Appeal, learned counsel for the appellants has candidly submitted that though the matter is still pending before the learned Single Judge in the shape of various applications to be decided after hearing the parties in accordance with law, whereas, the appellants have an opportunity to seek recalling or modification of the order passed by the learned Single Judge in the above Suits, however, submits that since the respondents have not even filed a reply/objections to CMA No.12550/2021 filed under Order XXXIX Rule 1 & 2 CPC and are not coming forward to proceed with the matter. Learned counsel for the appellants however submits that appellants will not press instant High Court Appeal provided that the learned Single Judge may be directed to decide the pending application(s) in the aforesaid Suits including the above injunction application and may pass appropriate order after hearing the parties at an early date in accordance with law so that appellant may not cause any loss, who is builder and developers.
Accordingly, instant High Court Appeal is disposed of with the direction to the appellants to appear before the learned Single Judge by filing urgent application soon-after winter holidays, whereas, it is expected that learned Single Judge may pass an appropriate order on pending application(s) including injunction application after providing opportunity of being heard to the learned counsel for the parties at an early date, preferably, within a period of 15 days from the date of filing urgent application.
Instant High Court Appeal stands disposed of in the above terms along with listed applications.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Nadeem
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC KHI 330 · 24 Dec 2021 Waseem Ahmed & Another (Appellant) VS Parveen Rahim Niaz & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2023 SHC KHI 1146 · 8 Mar 2023 Hassan Farid Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Aslam Siddiqui & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2022 SHC KHI 671 · 10 Jan 2022 Pakistan Petroleum Ltd. (Appellant) VS United Energy Pakistan & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2021 SHC KHI 760 · 19 Nov 2021 M/s. United Bank Limited (Appellant) VS Mukhtar Ahmed Shah (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2022 SHC KHI 446 · 16 Feb 2022 Umar Baig & others (Appellant) VS M. Aslam Suleman Toberia & others (Respondent)