Hassan Farid Khan (Appellant) VS Muhammad Aslam Siddiqui & Others (Respondent)

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

HCA No.339 of 2022

Order with signature of Judge

1.For orders on office objections

2.For hearing of CMA No.3357 of 2022.

3.For hearing of main case

4.For hearing of CMA NO.3335 of 2022.

Mr. Ghulam Shabbir Shah, Advocate along with Mr. Shahzaib, Advocate for the appellant.

Mr. Salahuddin Ahmed, Advocate along with Mr. Ravi R. Pinjani, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mr. Jamal Bukhari, Advocate for respondent No.2.

Mr. Ali Zaidi, Advocate for respondents No.3, 4 and 6. Mr. Ovais Ali Shah, Advocate for respondent Nos.8, 10, 11 and 12. Mr. Abbas Rasheed Razvi, Advocate for respondent Nos.13 o 15. Mr. Miran Mohammad Shah, Additional Advocate General Sindh. Mr. Ghaulam Shabbir Sheikh, Advocate for Board of Revenue.

Learned counsel for the appellant and learned AAG have filed statements, which are taken on record and copies whereof have been supplied to the learned counsel for the other side.

After hearing the learned counsel for the parties at some length and keeping in view the fact that instant appeal has been filed against an ex-parte ad-interim order on the first date of hearing passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court while recording the contention of the learned counsel for the plaintiff, whereas while issuing notices to the other side, the parties have been directed to maintain status quo, whereas the hearing of the injunction application before the learned Singe Judge is reportedly fixed tomorrow i.e.

09.03.2023 along with hearing of application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC filed by the appellant seeking rejection of plaint, wherein as per learned counsel for the appellant counter affidavit has been filed by the respondents wherein all such objections have been raised, by consent of all the learned counsel for the parties present, instant High Court Appeal is disposed of with the directions to the learned counsel for the parties to appear before the learned Single Judge and proceed with the hearing of above pending applications, by raising all

such objections which have been agitated through instant High Court Appeal, whereas it is expected that the learned Single Judge may pass appropriate orders on such applications preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of final hearing of such applications.

Instant High Court Appeal stands disposed of in the above terms along with pending applications.

JUDGE

JUDGE

Farooq ps/*