Sindh High Court Decided 3 November 2025

Muhammad Salman S/o Malik Muhammad Usman (Petitioner) VS The Inspector General of Police (Sindh) and others (Respondent)

Case: Const. P. 1099/2024
Type: Writ Jurisdictions
Judge: Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Length: 1 page

Summary from the court's website

This is a case of simple harassment. However, the petitioner???s counsel did not press clause-2 of the prayer clause. Learned Assistant PG present in Court submits that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, however, if there is a cognizable offence, police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. With this observation, the instant petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s).

Full judgment

Official copy

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

Constitutional Petition No. S-1099 of 2024 Date Order with signature of Judge(s)

1.For order on office objection as at ‘A’

2.For hearing of CMA No.8343/2025 (U/A 199)

3.For hearing of main case

Mr. Arbaz Waseem advocate for the petitioner Mr. Mumtaz Ali Shah, Assistant PG

This is a case of simple harassment. However, the petitioner’s counsel did not press clause-2 of the prayer clause. Learned Assistant PG present in Court submits that no harassment shall be caused to the petitioner, however, if there is a cognizable offence, police shall be free to take action in accordance with law. With this observation, the instant petition stands disposed of alongwith listed / pending application(s).

JUDGE

Zahid/*

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Summary from the court's website

Full judgment

Similar judgments