Sindh High Court

Mirza Muhammad Umar Baig (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & others (Respondent)

Case
Const. P. 1452/2017
Type
Writ Jurisdictions
Judge
Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon
Length
1 page

Full judgment

Official copy

ORDER SHEET

IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI

C.P No.S-1452 of 2017

DATE ORDER WITH SIGNATURES OF JUDGE(S)

Hearing / priority case.

1.For hearing of main case.

2.For hearing of CMA No.6842/2017.

Mr. Zakir Khaskheli advocate for the petitioner. Ms. Yasmeen Sultana State Counsel along with SI Abdul Haleem Bullo, P.S Gulshan-e-Iqbal.

It is inter-alia contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that private respondents No.7 and 8 in league with official respondent No.6 are causing harassment to the petitioner and prays that they may be directed to act strictly in accordance with law.

S.I Abdul Haleem Bullo files parawise comments on behalf of respondent No.6 / SHO, Gulshan-e-Iqbal, Karachi, which are taken on record. He categorically states that neither they have caused harassment to the petitioner nor intend to do so in future.

Ms. Yasmeen Sultana, State Counsel states that State functionaries are legally bound to provide legal protection to all the citizens including the petitioner without any discrimination and ensures that official respondents shall conduct themselves strictly in accordance with law.

Learned counsel for the petitioner being satisfied with the above statement made by learned State Counsel as well as S.I Abdul Haleem Bullo, P.S Gulshan-e-Iqbal, and seeks disposal of instant petition. This being the position, the instant petition is disposed of in terms of the statement given supra.

JUDGE

S.Soomro/PA

Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.

Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.

Please confirm