Sindh High Court
Mst. Komal & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Case
- Const. P. 3549/2026
- Type
- Writ Jurisdictions
- Bench
- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon, Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhry
- Length
- 2 pages
Full judgment
Official copyORDER SHEET
IN THE HIGH COURT OF SINDH AT KARACHI
CP. No. D-3549/2026 (Mst. Komal & another Vs. Province of Sindh & others)
Date Order with signature of Judge(s) Before:- Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon Mr. Justice Adnan Iqbal Chaudhary
1.For orders on office objections
2.For hearing of CMAs 13972/2026
3.For hearing of main case.
Date of hearing and order. 01-07-2026.
Mr. Ameer Ali Jalbani advocate for the petitioners.
Ms. Seema Zaidi, APG Ms. Nasurat Sultana AAG along with P.I Abdul Rashid of P.S Sohrab Goth, Ch. M. Sadiq Gujjar DSP (Legal Branch) AIGP, Karachi.
ORDER
ADNAN-UL-KARIM MEMON, J: The petitioners have invoked the constitutional jurisdiction of this Court under Article 199 of the Constitution seeking quashment of FIR No. 59 of 2026 registered under Sections 365-B and 34 PPC at Police Station Warah, District Qambar Shahdadkot, on the ground that petitioner No.1, Mst. Komal, being a major, solemnized marriage with petitioner No.2, Musawar, of her own free will and has been falsely shown as an abductee at the instance of her father, respondent No.8, who is opposed to their marriage.
2.Learned counsel submitted that the impugned FIR has been lodged with mala fide intention solely to harass the petitioners and that petitioner No.1 has voluntarily chosen to reside with her husband.
3.Pursuant to the order of this Court dated 03.06.2026, notices were issued to the respondents. Petitioner No.1 appeared before this Court and unequivocally stated that she had contracted marriage with petitioner No.2 on 01.06.2026 of her own free will and without any coercion.
4.The Investigating Officer also recorded her statement and submitted that, in view thereof, he would place his report before the competent Magistrate for disposal of the case under C class in terms of the statement of the lady petitioner.
5.The police officials further assured the Court that no harassment would be caused to the petitioners, while the I.O shall obtain a personal bond from the private
respondents in the sum of Rs.500,000/- to ensure that neither they nor their family would cause any harm to the couple.
6.Accordingly, this petition is disposed of with directions to the concerned police to extend protection to the petitioners whenever required and to ensure that no harassment is caused to them. The Investigating Officer shall submit his report before the learned Magistrate, for disposal of the case as per the statement of the petitioner lady.
JUDGE
JUDGE
Shafi/P.A
Text extracted from the court's PDF and reflowed for reading. The court's official copy is authoritative.
Similar judgments
Closest in subject matter, from every court in the library.
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1519 · 26 Feb 2020 Mst Safiya & another (Petitioner) VS P.O Sindh & Other (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2020 SHC HYD 1753 · 16 Jan 2020 Mst. Shakeela & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Ors (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 839 · 16 Apr 2026 Mst. Aliza & another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2026 SHC KHI 1420 · 6 Jul 2026 Naeem Ahmed & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & others (Respondent)
- Sindh High Court · 2025 SHC KHI 3242 · 3 Nov 2025 Mst. Saima & Another (Petitioner) VS Province of Sindh & Others (Respondent)